IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0314168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to implementing contingency management at a methadone treatment clinic: A qualitative study at a tertiary hospital in Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Paul S Lawala
  • Christopher F Akiba
  • Damali L Kabwali
  • Liness A Ndelwa
  • Betuna E Mwamboneke
  • Albino Kalolo

Abstract

Introduction: Contingency management in addiction behaviors has been widely applied in high income settings. Contingency management entails modification of behavior via the control or manipulation of consequences (contingencies) to the behavior. While a need exists for contingency management in low- and middle- income settings, specifically those of the sub-Saharan Africa region, uptake is low relative to high income settings. This study assessed barriers to implementation of contingency management for methadone treatment clients at the outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital in Tanzania. Methods: This study employed a qualitative design and was conducted at Mbeya Zonal Referral Hospital (MZRH). Guided by the consolidated framework of implementation research (CFIR), data were collected from two sources 1) ten purposively selected key informants (health care workers, methadone treatment clients and hospital leaders) who participated in in-depth interviews, and 2) a mini focus group discussion with five participants (two health care providers, two hospital leaders and one leader of methadone treatment clients). We developed semi-structured guides for in-depth interviews and the mini focus group to explore the key barriers. We analyzed the collected data using thematic analysis. Results: Reported barriers revolved around the following key themes: lack of awareness and knowledge regarding contingency management, financial constraints to support implementation, trust between clients and health care workers, Health care workers work load, client behaviors and clinic culture. Participants mentioned lack of awareness and knowledge more frequently compared to other themes. Conclusion: In the context of specialized outpatient care in Tanzania, contingency management faces a variety of barriers. Deliberate efforts to establish and sustain contingency management in these settings require strategies that attend to the identified barriers. If the barriers are overcome, contingency management implementation and sustainment may follow and ultimately improve methadone related health outcome for patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul S Lawala & Christopher F Akiba & Damali L Kabwali & Liness A Ndelwa & Betuna E Mwamboneke & Albino Kalolo, 2025. "Barriers to implementing contingency management at a methadone treatment clinic: A qualitative study at a tertiary hospital in Tanzania," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0314168
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314168
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314168&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0314168?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0314168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.