IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0313892.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association between quantitative flow ratio and clinical outcomes in multivessel disease STEMI patients with diabetes mellitus

Author

Listed:
  • Huimin Xian
  • Xing Luo
  • Yanzong Liu
  • Bingchen Guo
  • JianJun Wu
  • Fan Yang
  • Yiyuan Guo
  • Ruoxi Zhang

Abstract

Background: Among patients with multivessel disease and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MVD-STEMI), complete revascularization (CR) has been shown with improved outcomes. However, it is controversial whether diabetes mellitus (DM) status affects the outcomes. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR), as a newer non-invasive tool for identifying functional coronary stenosis and determining the presence of functional CR (FCR), may open up a new perspective for studying the above issues. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate an association between QFR-based FCR and clinical outcomes in MVD-STEMI patients under DM status. Methods: A total of 623 patients were included in the final analysis. The patients were divided into nonDM cohort and DM cohort. Within each cohort, patients were further stratified into functional CR (FCR) layer and functional incomplete revascularization (FIR) layer based on QFR assessment. The primary outcomes were 3-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), encompassing cardiac death, ischemia-driven revascularization (target vessel and non-target vessel), rehospitalization due to unstable angina pectoris, and non-fatal myocardial infarction. Results: The incidence of MACEs was significantly lower in the FCR layer than in the FIR layer (12.6% vs 24.0%, log-rank P

Suggested Citation

  • Huimin Xian & Xing Luo & Yanzong Liu & Bingchen Guo & JianJun Wu & Fan Yang & Yiyuan Guo & Ruoxi Zhang, 2024. "Association between quantitative flow ratio and clinical outcomes in multivessel disease STEMI patients with diabetes mellitus," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0313892
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313892
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0313892
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0313892&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0313892?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0313892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.