IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0313347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A methodological framework for deriving the German food-based dietary guidelines 2024: Food groups, nutrient goals, and objective functions

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Carolin Schäfer
  • Heiner Boeing
  • Rozenn Gazan
  • Johanna Conrad
  • Kurt Gedrich
  • Christina Breidenassel
  • Hans Hauner
  • Anja Kroke
  • Jakob Linseisen
  • Stefan Lorkowski
  • Ute Nöthlings
  • Margrit Richter
  • Lukas Schwingshackl
  • Florent Vieux
  • Bernhard Watzl

Abstract

Background: For a growing number of food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs), diet optimization is the tool of choice to account for the complex demands of healthy and sustainable diets. However, decisions about such optimization models’ parameters are rarely reported nor systematically studied. Objectives: The objectives were to develop a framework for (i) the formulation of decision variables based on a hierarchical food classification system; (ii) the mathematical form of the objective function; and (iii) approaches to incorporate nutrient goals. Methods: To answer objective (i), food groups from FoodEx2 levels 3-7 were applied as decision variables in a model using acceptability constraints (5th and 95th percentile for food intakes of German adults (n = 10,419)) and minimizing the deviation from the average observed dietary intakes. Building upon, to answer objectives (ii) and (iii), twelve models were run using decision variables from FoodEx2 level 3 (n = 255), applying either a linear or squared and a relative or absolute way to deviate from observed dietary intakes, and three different lists of nutrient goals (allNUT-DRV, incorporating all nutrient goals; modNUT-DRV excluding nutrients with limited data quality; modNUT-AR using average requirements where applicable instead of recommended intakes). Results: FoodEx2 food groups proved suitable as diet optimization decision variables. Regarding deviation, the largest differences were between the four different objective function types, e.g., in the linear-relative modNUT-DRV model, 46 food groups of the observed diet were changed to reach the model’s goal, in linear-absolute 78 food groups, squared-relative 167, and squared-absolute 248. The nutrient goals were fulfilled in all models, but the number of binding nutrient constraints was highest in the linear-relative models (e.g. allNUT-DRV: 11 vs. 7 in linear-absolute). Conclusion: Considering the various possibilities to operationalize dietary aspects in an optimization model, this study offers valuable contributions to a framework for developing FBDGs via diet optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Carolin Schäfer & Heiner Boeing & Rozenn Gazan & Johanna Conrad & Kurt Gedrich & Christina Breidenassel & Hans Hauner & Anja Kroke & Jakob Linseisen & Stefan Lorkowski & Ute Nöthlings & Margrit R, 2025. "A methodological framework for deriving the German food-based dietary guidelines 2024: Food groups, nutrient goals, and objective functions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0313347
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0313347
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0313347&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0313347?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0313347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.