Author
Listed:
- Longlong Yu
- Zhihao Liu
- Yangkai Li
Abstract
Monitoring grassland productivity dynamics is essential for understanding the impacts of climate variation and human activities. Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) has been validated as an effective indicator of gross primary productivity. Satellite-derived vegetation indices (VIs) have long been used as key proxies for vegetation productivity. However, the ability of different VIs to represent grassland productivity in relation to SIF, as well as their spatiotemporal consistency with SIF at various scales, remains unclear. In this study, we systematically compared the performance of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), and the Near-Infrared Reflectance of Vegetation (NIRv), using SIF as a benchmark in grassland areas of China. Utilizing TROPOMI SIF and MODIS VI datasets from 2018 to 2021, we analyzed the spatial and temporal consistency between VIs and SIF at a monthly scale and 0.05-degree resolution, employing Pearson correlation coefficients, paired-sample t-tests, and two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The results indicate that NIRv consistently demonstrates a higher capacity to capture variations in SIF compared to EVI and NDVI. In low-elevation areas with high-productivity grasslands, all three vegetation indices exhibit a stronger ability to represent vegetation productivity than in high-elevation areas with low-productivity vegetation types. These findings suggest that, at a monthly and regional spatiotemporal scale, NIRv can serve as a robust complement to SIF in monitoring vegetation productivity dynamics, particularly given the challenges in acquiring high-quality, long-term SIF data.
Suggested Citation
Longlong Yu & Zhihao Liu & Yangkai Li, 2024.
"Evaluation on spatiotemporal consistency between solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and vegetation indices in grassland ecosystems,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-18, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0313258
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313258
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- repec:iwt:jounls:h051841 is not listed on IDEAS
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0313258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.