IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0313132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explainable machine learning for early prediction of sepsis in traumatic brain injury: A discovery and validation study

Author

Listed:
  • Wenchi Liu
  • Xing Yu
  • Jinhong Chen
  • Weizhi Chen
  • Qiaoyi Wu

Abstract

Background: People with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at high risk for infection and sepsis. The aim of the study was to develop and validate an explainable machine learning(ML) model based on clinical features for early prediction of the risk of sepsis in TBI patients. Methods: We enrolled all patients with TBI in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database from 2008 to 2019. All patients were randomly divided into a training set (70%) and a test set (30%). The univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used for feature selection. Six ML methods were applied to develop the model. The predictive performance of different models were determined based on the area under the curve (AUC) and calibration curves in the test cohort. In addition, we selected the eICU Collaborative Research Database version 1.2 as the external validation dataset. Finally, we used the Shapley additive interpretation to account for the effects of features attributed to the model. Results: Of the 1555 patients enrolled in the final cohort, 834 (53.6%) patients developed sepsis after TBI. Six variables were associated with concomitant sepsis and were used to develop ML models. Of the 6 models constructed, the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) model achieved the best performance with an AUC of 0.807 and an accuracy of 74.5% in the internal validation cohort, and an AUC of 0.762 for the external validation. Feature importance analysis revealed that use mechanical ventilation, SAPSII score, use intravenous pressors, blood transfusion on admission, history of diabetes, and presence of post-stroke sequelae were the top six most influential features of the XGB model. Conclusion: As shown in the study, the ML model could be used to predict the occurrence of sepsis in patients with TBI in the intensive care unit.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenchi Liu & Xing Yu & Jinhong Chen & Weizhi Chen & Qiaoyi Wu, 2024. "Explainable machine learning for early prediction of sepsis in traumatic brain injury: A discovery and validation study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0313132
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0313132
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0313132&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0313132?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0313132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.