Determining household out of pocket payments, incidence of catastrophic expenditures and impoverishment among patients with malaria in Zambia’s path towards Universal Health Coverage

Background: The World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates that about 3.2 billion people which is nearly half of the world’s population are at risk of malaria. Annually about 216 million cases and 445,000 deaths of malaria occur globally. Africa accounted for 90% and 91% of the malaria cases and deaths respectively. Zambia has earmarked malaria elimination on its path to Universal Health Coverage (UHC). This paper aims to determine the incidence of Out-of-Pocket Payments (OOP) and Catastrophic Health Expenditures (CHE) and impoverishment among households with malaria patients in Zambia. The paper focusses on the incidence of OOP and impoverishment for malaria in a setting without user fees for accessing primary malaria health care services and virtually no user fees at all levels of care if referred through the referral system. The results of this study will also serve as a baseline for tracking Zambia’s path towards achieving malaria financial access on its path towards UHC among patient with malaria. Methods: The study uses a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of households in both rural and urban areas of Zambia. The study employed probability sampling procedures. A two-stage stratified cluster sample design was used. We analyse a total of 2,005 households that had at least one member suffering from malaria with a recall period of four weeks for out-patients and six months for the in-patient respectively. A logistic regression model was estimated with a Categorical Dependent variable being CHE (CHE = = 1, or otherwise = = 0). A household is considered impoverished if it fell below the poverty line due to OOP. All data was analyzed using Stata version 2013. Results and discussion: The results show that although the country has a free malaria policy at primary care level and virtually at all levels if referred through the health system process, households are still incurring costs in accessing health care services. Incidence of CHE and impoverishment were reflected at all levels. In terms of CHE, the poorest contributed almost 30% while the wealthier quintile contributed about 10%. Similarly, impoverishment effects of OOPs are more pronounced in the poorest quintile. The OOP composed mainly of transport, followed by diagnosis and medicines and was lowest for Insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) payments. The high costs of transport that the households had to incur when accessing health services could be due to the long distance that the households have to face as they travel to the health facilities as most of the facilities in Zambia are still outside the 5 km radius. The drug expenditure could be explained by the drugs running out of stock. Low expenditure on ITNs could be due to the country’s strategy of mass distribution working to give the country’s universal financial protection on ITNs for malaria. Conclusion and policy implications: This study sought to address gaps in OOP and the associated incidence of CHE and impoverishment for malaria, distribution of OOP among Social Economic Status (SES) setting and determinants of OOP in Country that has earmarked malaria elimination in the UHC agenda. Understanding household’s costs related to malaria will enable targeting intervention to accelerate Zambia’s path towards elimination of malaria and therefore contribute to attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals of household’s financial access to UHC. Thus, the study will also serve as a baseline for tracking UHC for household financial access to malaria care that the country has embarked on.