Author
Listed:
- Mathieu Le Stum
- Myriam Le Goff-Pronost
- Eric Stindel
- Guillaume Dardenne
Abstract
Background: From several decades, the evolutions of the Incidence Rate (IR) of Primary Knee Arthroplasties are continuously increasing worldwide and have been widely studied in several countries. Some recent works have highlighted the fact that the IR is following a sigmoid curve composed of an exponential growth followed by a linear phase and finished by a plateau. Our objective is to assess the IR evolution of eleven European countries, representing thus a large proportion of this continent, regarding this sigmoid. Methods: IRs of primary knee arthroplasties for Austria, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom between 2005 and 2019 were retrieved from the EUROSTAT database. Several regression models were fitted to each country’s IRs: Poisson, linear, asymptotic, logistic, and Gompertz regression. For each country and each model, the RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) and R2 were calculated and used to estimate their position with respect to this sigmoid curve. Results: The best regression models for knee arthroplasties varied following countries. Logistic and Gompertz regressions had the lowest RMSE and R2 values for Austria, Denmark, Germany, Sweden, and the UK. Hungary, Italy, and Poland favored the Poisson regression model. Finland and Spain presented difficulties in determining the optimal model (linear or Poisson), while France faced challenges in choosing between logistic, Gompertz, and linear regression. Conclusion: In conclusion, the growth dynamics of IR differ across European countries. Some countries seem to have already reached a plateau and will therefore experience slight growth in the future.
Suggested Citation
Mathieu Le Stum & Myriam Le Goff-Pronost & Eric Stindel & Guillaume Dardenne, 2025.
"Incidence rate of total knee arthroplasties in eleven European countries: Do they reach a plateau?,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-11, January.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0312701
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312701
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0312701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.