IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0312650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative association between NAFLD and MAFLD with cardiovascular events and mortality: Evidence from observational studies

Author

Listed:
  • Taoli Fu
  • Jitao Ling
  • Huilei Zhao
  • Kaixin Lin
  • You Deng
  • Miao Zhang
  • Xinrui Qi
  • Peng Yu
  • Weichun Lin
  • Xiao Liu

Abstract

Background: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) are increasingly recognized as multisystemic conditions with significant extrahepatic manifestations. Although both diseases have been linked to cardiovascular events and mortality, the strength of these associations remains controversial. This review aims to compare the risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in individuals with NAFLD and MAFLD. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify studies investigating the risk of CVD, CVD death, and all-cause death associated with NAFLD and MAFLD through April 28th, 2024. Data extraction and study quality assessment were performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Statistical analysis utilized random-effects models. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Eleven cohort studies with 11,995,994 patients were included. Both NAFLD and MAFLD were associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events (NAFLD group vs. non-NAFLD group: HR = 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13–1.49, I2 = 91%; MAFLD group vs. non-MAFLD group: HR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.32–1.81, I2 = 92%) and all-cause death (NAFLD group vs. non-NAFLD group: HR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.04–1.33, I2 = 55%; MAFLD group vs. non-MAFLD group: HR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.20–1.40, I2 = 0%). The MAFLD-only group had a stronger association with cardiovascular death than the NAFLD-only group (MAFLD-only group vs neither MAFLD nor NAFLD group: HR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.40–1.51, I2 = 0%; NAFLD-only group vs neither MAFLD nor NAFLD group: HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.95–1.28, I2 = 0%, P for interaction

Suggested Citation

  • Taoli Fu & Jitao Ling & Huilei Zhao & Kaixin Lin & You Deng & Miao Zhang & Xinrui Qi & Peng Yu & Weichun Lin & Xiao Liu, 2025. "Comparative association between NAFLD and MAFLD with cardiovascular events and mortality: Evidence from observational studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0312650
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312650
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0312650
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0312650&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0312650?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0312650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.