IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0312547.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Navigating the cancer care continuum: A comparative study of Black and White breast cancer patients

Author

Listed:
  • Min K Lee
  • Naomi T-T Levine
  • Lisa R Hayes
  • Cleveland G Shields
  • Yuehwern Yih

Abstract

Despite improvements in early detection and therapeutic interventions, the mortality rate for Black breast cancer patients is still significantly higher than that of White breast cancer patients. This study seeks to understand differences in the patient experience that lead to this disparity. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to understand the breast cancer treatment process and patient experiences. This study collected health services and timeline data from medical records. Based on these two data sources, the patient’s journey in breast cancer treatment was mapped and a thematic analysis was conducted to identify challenges and barriers in the process. The cancer care continuum consists of four stages—diagnosis, surgery, chemotherapy/radiation, and follow-up care. The themes contributing to patient experiences and challenges were identified and compared in each stage for both Black and White patients. Both Black and White participants faced challenges related to financial constraints, treatment changes, lack of autonomy, and insufficient emotional support. However, Black participants additionally faced significant barriers in terms of cultural concordance, effective patient-provider communication, and delay in diagnosis. This study highlights the importance of incorporating effective provider-patient communication, navigation, and emotional support, especially for Black breast cancer patients throughout the cancer care continuum to address healthcare disparities.

Suggested Citation

  • Min K Lee & Naomi T-T Levine & Lisa R Hayes & Cleveland G Shields & Yuehwern Yih, 2024. "Navigating the cancer care continuum: A comparative study of Black and White breast cancer patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0312547
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312547
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0312547
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0312547&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0312547?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0312547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.