IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0312499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pain management practice and associated factors among nurses working in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Melesse Abiye Munie
  • Amsalu Baylie Taye
  • Befkad Derese Tilahun
  • Addis Wondmagegn Alamaw
  • Gebremeskel Kibret Abebe
  • Migbaru Endawoke Tiruye
  • Biruk Beletew Abate

Abstract

Background: Pain management is a crucial component of patient care that promotes relaxation, lowers complications, improves quality of life, and shortens hospital stays. Several studies assessed the nurses’ pain management practices in Ethiopia. However, the findings of these studies are highly variable and inconsistent. Therefore, the study aims to determine the overall prevalence of pain management practice and associated factors among nurses working in Ethiopia. Method: The study included all observational quantitative research articles conducted among nurses in Ethiopia. We used Google Scholar, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus searching databases. The Newcastle—Ottawa Scale was used to check the study quality. Then I2 statistics and Cochran’s Q test were used to evaluate heterogeneity. The Funnel, Egger’s test, and non-parametric trim and fill effect tests were used to check publication bias by using a random effect model. Finally, we conducted subgroup analysis and sensitivity tests to evaluate statistical heterogeneity and the presence or absence of any influential study. Result: In the final analysis, we included eighteen studies, and 4,213 nurses participated. The overall pooled prevalence of nurses with good pain management practice was 43.79% (95% CI: 38.52, 49.06%). In-service training AOR; 95% CI 3.21 (1.87, 4.54), good knowledge AOR; 95% CI 2.44 (1.78, 3.09), positive attitudes AOR; 95% CI 2.84 (1.24, 4.44), and pain management guidelines in health facilities AOR; 95% CI 3.46 (1.48, 5.44) were the significant associated factors with pain management practice among nurses in Ethiopia. Conclusion: This study found that over half of Ethiopian nurses had poor pain management practices. Knowledge, attitude, training, and pain management guidelines in health facilities were significant factors. Therefore, health managers and stakeholders should prioritize pain management awareness, attitudes, availability of guidelines, and in-service training to improve patient care and outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Melesse Abiye Munie & Amsalu Baylie Taye & Befkad Derese Tilahun & Addis Wondmagegn Alamaw & Gebremeskel Kibret Abebe & Migbaru Endawoke Tiruye & Biruk Beletew Abate, 2025. "Pain management practice and associated factors among nurses working in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0312499
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0312499
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0312499&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0312499?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0312499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.