Author
Listed:
- Jennifer Smith-Merry
- Damian Mellifont
- Justin Newton Scanlan
- Nicola Hancock
Abstract
Unkind bureaucratic policies such as the Australian Robodebt policy, which targeted welfare recipients with automatic debt letters, and are geared towards economic savings, can significantly harm those impacted by them. Compassion and kindness are receiving increased research attention related to how organisations work internally. However, a greater investment in studies is needed to increase understandings about how compassion and kindness can underpin interactions with external stakeholders. Addressing this research gap, we aimed to identify barriers, enablers and outcomes to organisational kindness and compassion informed by the literature, and to propose future research directions related to organisational kindness and compassion towards external stakeholders. A search of four scholarly databases identified 25 relevant publications. Thematic analysis of included publications revealed barriers of commodification, personal risks, dysfunctional environments, inauthentic attempts at, and a lack of understanding of the need to be compassionate or kind. Enablers included building compassion into organisational policies, processes, practices and activities, compassion contagion, training of staff, leading with compassion, and kind and compassionate communication. Outcomes of kindness included building positive and healthy relationships with stakeholders, supporting positive experiences among stakeholders, and contributing to an organisation’s profitability, productivity, performance and standing in the community. We conclude by recognising that kindness is essential for ongoing trust in health and social care institutions and government policy.
Suggested Citation
Jennifer Smith-Merry & Damian Mellifont & Justin Newton Scanlan & Nicola Hancock, 2025.
"Organisational kindness and compassion: what are the barriers, enablers and outcomes for clients and stakeholders?,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-18, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0312450
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312450
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0312450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.