IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0312353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"Do we register our deaths?": Motivations and barriers to death registration in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Wiredu Agyekum
  • Frank Kyei-Arthur
  • Seth Kissi Bosompem

Abstract

Death registration is generally low in sub-Saharan African countries, including Ghana. This study investigated the factors that motivate and serve as barriers in registering for a death certificate. A cross-sectional qualitative study design was used to interview twelve birth and death registration officers in Ghana. The interviews were analysed using Atlas.ti version 7.5. The results show that death registration in Ghana is generally low. Processing of a deceased person’s estate emerged as the main motivation for the registration of death. Other motivators included the obligation to register deaths and the requirement of death certificates for burial. The barriers to death registration included the governance system at the cemetery, the hastiness in burying the dead, the perception of cost of death certificates, and less importance attached to death registration. Policymakers should consider these factors in the design of interventions to increase the rate of death registration in Ghana.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Wiredu Agyekum & Frank Kyei-Arthur & Seth Kissi Bosompem, 2024. ""Do we register our deaths?": Motivations and barriers to death registration in Ghana," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0312353
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0312353
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0312353&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0312353?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0312353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.