IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0312004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in cervical cancer: Protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Author

Listed:
  • Dary Medeiros Dantas
  • Amaxsell Thiago Barros de Souza
  • Juliana Dantas de Araújo Santos Camargo
  • Ana Paula Ferreira Costa
  • Ayane Cristine Alves Samento
  • Andrea Juliana Pereira de Santana Gomes
  • Eduardo Pereira de Azevedo
  • Kleyton Santos de Medeiros
  • Isis Kelly dos Santos
  • Ricardo Ney Cobucci

Abstract

Purpose: This paper reports a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol that will be used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab, alone or combined with bevacizumab and other therapies, in adult women with cervical carcinoma from stage IB2 onwards. Methods: The protocol follows PRISMA-P recommendations and was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024531233). The search will be conducted without restrictions on language and year of publication in the following databases: Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cancerlit, The World Health Organization (WHO), International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Grey literature will be searched using the following sources: Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar and Opengrey. Manual search will be carried out for the reference lists of eligible studies. The studies will be selected independently by two reviewers and all completed or ongoing randomized clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab, used alone or combined with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, bevacizumab or surgery, in adult women diagnosed with cervical cancer, will be included. The data extraction will include population characteristics, type of treatment and main outcomes of studies. The methodological quality of the studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0. The certainty of the evidence will be rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Conclusions: The findings will be presented in narrative summary tables and a quantitative synthesis will be conducted using the ‘meta’ package of R software, version 4.3.1. This future systematic review may contribute with quality evidence for clinical decision-making on the use of pembrolizumab in women with cervical cancer.

Suggested Citation

  • Dary Medeiros Dantas & Amaxsell Thiago Barros de Souza & Juliana Dantas de Araújo Santos Camargo & Ana Paula Ferreira Costa & Ayane Cristine Alves Samento & Andrea Juliana Pereira de Santana Gomes & E, 2024. "Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in cervical cancer: Protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0312004
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0312004
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0312004&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0312004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0312004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.