IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0311926.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of design parameters on the outcome of intrastromal ring surgery using biomechanical simulations

Author

Listed:
  • Shima Bahramizadeh-Sajadi
  • Hamid Reza Katoozian
  • Miguel Angel Ariza-Gracia
  • Morteza Gholami
  • Alireza Baradaran-Rafii
  • Philippe Büchler

Abstract

Background: The cornea plays a role in the refractive power of the eye, and when its natural curvature and thickness are compromised by diseases such as keratoconus or high myopia, this results in loss of visual acuity. Intracorneal rings (ICRs) were developed as a treatment option to restore the natural corneal curvature by implanting rings into tunnels cut within the corneal stroma. However, selecting and placing the appropriate ring can be difficult, and predicting refractive outcomes is challenging. Objective: The purpose of this study was to better understand the design parameters of the rings that determine postoperative refractive and mechanical outcomes. Methods: We developed an automated finite element simulation pipeline for ICR implantation and tested 300 variations of 20 ICRs. Results: The outcome of ICR was dominated by the vertical size of the ring; 84% of the change in corneal curvature can be attributed to the vertical size of the ring, while only 13% were attributed to the detailed cross-sectional shape of the ring. However, the cross-sectional shape of the ring is limited to the change in axial length and contact pressure between the ring and the cornea. The horizontal dimension of the ring plays only a minor role in the postoperative outcome. Conclusion: These results support Keraring’s approach to ring scaling, in which only the vertical dimension of the ring is changed, while the horizontal dimension remains constant. Numerical models help to understand ICR outcomes, design implants, and personalize empirical nomograms to achieve more successful postoperative outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Shima Bahramizadeh-Sajadi & Hamid Reza Katoozian & Miguel Angel Ariza-Gracia & Morteza Gholami & Alireza Baradaran-Rafii & Philippe Büchler, 2024. "Evaluation of design parameters on the outcome of intrastromal ring surgery using biomechanical simulations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0311926
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311926
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0311926
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0311926&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0311926?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gonzalo García de Oteyza & Juan Álvarez de Toledo & Rafael I Barraquer & Sabine Kling, 2021. "Refractive changes of a new asymmetric intracorneal ring segment with variable thickness and base width: A 2D finite-element model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0311926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.