IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0311861.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The international trial of nasal oxygen therapy after cardiac surgery (NOTACS) in patients at high risk of postoperative pulmonary complications: Economic evaluation protocol and analysis plan

Author

Listed:
  • Siddesh Shetty
  • Melissa Duckworth
  • Richard Norman
  • Jacquita Affandi
  • Sarah Dawson
  • Julia Fox-Rushby
  • On behalf of NOTACS investigators
  • On behalf of NOTACS Trial Steering Committee
  • On behalf of NOTACS DMEC Committee

Abstract

Introduction: High-Flow Nasal Therapy (HFNT) is an innovative non-invasive form of respiratory support. Compared to standard oxygen therapy (SOT), there is an equipoise regarding the effect of HFNT on patient-centred outcomes among those at high risk of developing postoperative pulmonary complications after undergoing cardiac surgery. The NOTACS trial aims to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of HFNT compared to SOT within 90 days of surgery in the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand. This protocol describes the methods and analyses planned for economic evaluation embedded within the ongoing NOTACS trial. Methods and analysis: The economic evaluation will identify, measure and value resources and health outcomes in both trial arms and compare changes in costs with ‘days alive and at home’ and EQ-5D-5L quality adjusted life years (QALYs) from the perspective most relevant to the decision-making country. Results from pooling data across the trial will use health and social care sector perspective. All patient-specific data including hospital/community care and health outcomes will be collected prospectively. Unit costs will be sourced from national, published or local data. Missing data will be assessed, with values replaced depending on assumed mechanism of missingness, and impact of replacement on cost-effectiveness assessed. Costs and outcomes by trial arm will be presented as components and totals per patient using a range of descriptive statistics. Regression models for costs and effects will account for patient characteristics, quality of life and health service utilization at baseline. Uncertainty in parameters, sampling and heterogeneity will be addressed through deterministic, probabilistic and subgroup analyses to assess the impact of varying methods and assumptions for costs, outcomes and approaches used in base-case analysis. Results will be interpreted using recommended national cost-effectiveness thresholds. Registration details: The study is registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN14092678) on 13/05/2020. ISRCTN is a primary registry of the WHO ICTRP network and includes all items from the WHO Trial Registration data set.

Suggested Citation

  • Siddesh Shetty & Melissa Duckworth & Richard Norman & Jacquita Affandi & Sarah Dawson & Julia Fox-Rushby & On behalf of NOTACS investigators & On behalf of NOTACS Trial Steering Committee & On behalf , 2025. "The international trial of nasal oxygen therapy after cardiac surgery (NOTACS) in patients at high risk of postoperative pulmonary complications: Economic evaluation protocol and analysis plan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0311861
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0311861
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0311861&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0311861?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0311861. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.