IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0311686.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pooled prevalence and subgroup variations of Tetralogy of Fallot among children and adolescents with congenital heart defect in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Biniam Endale Geleta
  • Abay Mulu

Abstract

Background: Tetralogy of Fallot is one of the critical congenital heart defects needing intervention within the first year of life. Objective: This review aims to systematically assess the prevalence of Tetralogy of Fallot among children and adolescents with congenital heart defects in Sub-Saharan Africa from January 2000 to January 2024. Methods: All original observational studies focused on children and adolescent population diagnosed with congenital heart defects within Sub-Saharan Africa; reported the primary outcome of interest were included. Prisma guidelines were utilized to perform this systematic review and meta-analysis. Electronic databases including Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Google Scholar, and African Index Medicus were searched. A weighted inverse variance random-effects model was employed to estimate the pooled prevalence of Tetralogy of Fallot. Results: Thirty-one studies included encompassing a total of 11,265 participants from 15 Sub-Saharan African countries with representation from Southern (4 studies, 619 participants), Central (5 studies, 2,220 participants), Eastern (11 studies, 3,384 participants), and Western (11 studies, 5,042 participants). Cross-sectional studies comprised (25 studies, 8,909 participants), and cohort design (6 studies, 2,356 participants). The analysis revealed a pooled prevalence of 10% (95% CI: 9%; 12%) with I2 (77%, p-value

Suggested Citation

  • Biniam Endale Geleta & Abay Mulu, 2025. "Pooled prevalence and subgroup variations of Tetralogy of Fallot among children and adolescents with congenital heart defect in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-22, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0311686
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0311686
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0311686&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0311686?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0311686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.