IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0311324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The CASPAR study protocol. Can cervical stiffness predict successful vaginal delivery after induction of labour? a feasibility, cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth Medford
  • Steven Lane
  • Abi Merriel
  • Andrew Sharp
  • Angharad Care

Abstract

Background: Induction of labour (IOL) is a common obstetric intervention in the UK, affecting up to 33% of deliveries. IOL aims to achieve a vaginal delivery prior to spontaneous onset of labour to prevent harm from ongoing pregnancy complications and is known to prevent stillbirths and reduce neonatal intensive care unit admissions. However, IOL doesn’t come without risk and overall, 20% of mothers having an induction will still require a caesarean section birth and in primiparous mothers this rate is even higher. Methods: CASPAR is a feasibility study of term, primiparous women with singleton pregnancies undergoing IOL. Cervical stiffness will be assessed using the Pregnolia System; a novel, non-invasive, licensed, CE-marked, aspiration-based device proven to provide objective, quantitative cervical stiffness measurements represented as the Cervical Stiffness Index (CSI, in mbar). A measurement is obtained by applying the sterile single-use Pregnolia Probe directly to the anterior lip of the cervix, visualised via placement of a speculum. Discussion: This feasibility study will explore the use of this novel device in clinical practice for pre-induction cervical assessment and delivery outcome prediction. Our findings will provide novel data that could be instrumental in transforming clinical practice surrounding IOL. Determining recruitment rates and acceptability of this new assessment tool in this population will inform design of a further powered study using the Pregnolia System as the point-of-care, bedside cervical assessment tool within an IOL prediction model. Study registration: This study is sponsored by The University of Liverpool and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05981469, date of registration 7th July 2023.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Medford & Steven Lane & Abi Merriel & Andrew Sharp & Angharad Care, 2025. "The CASPAR study protocol. Can cervical stiffness predict successful vaginal delivery after induction of labour? a feasibility, cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0311324
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0311324
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0311324&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0311324?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0311324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.