Author
Listed:
- Liyan Sun
- Jingwen Bian
- Yi Xin
- Linqing Jiang
- Linxuan Zheng
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies typically considers epistatic interactions as a crucial factor in exploring complex diseases. However, the current methods primarily concentrate on the detection of two-order epistatic interactions, with flaws in accuracy. In this work, we introduce a novel method called Epi-SSA, which can be better utilized to detect high-order epistatic interactions. Epi-SSA draws inspiration from the sparrow search algorithm and optimizes the population based on multiple objective functions in each iteration, in order to be able to more precisely identify epistatic interactions.To evaluate its performance, we conducted a comprehensive comparison between Epi-SSA and seven other methods using five simulation datasets: DME 100, DNME 100, DME 1000, DNME 1000 and DNME3 100. The DME 100 dataset encompasses eight second-order epistasis disease models with marginal effects, each comprising 100 simulated data instances, featuring 100 SNPs per instance, alongside 800 case and 800 control samples. The DNME 100 encompasses eight second-order epistasis disease models without marginal effects and retains other properties consistent with DME 100. Experiments on the DME 100 and DNME 100 datasets were designed to evaluate the algorithms’ capacity to detect epistasis across varying disease models. The DME 1000 and DNME 1000 datasets extend the complexity with 1000 SNPs per simulated data instance, while retaining other properties consistent with DME 100 and DNME 100. These experiments aimed to gauge the algorithms’ adaptability in detecting epistasis as the number of SNPs in the data increases. The DNME3 100 dataset introduces a higher level of complexity with six third-order epistasis disease models, otherwise paralleling the structure of DNME 100, serving to test the algorithms’ proficiency in identifying higher-order epistasis. The highest average F-measures achieved by the seven other existing methods on the five datasets are 0.86, 0.86, 0.41, 0.56, and 0.79 respectively, while the average F-measures of Epi-SSA on the five datasets are 0.92, 0.97, 0.79, 0.86, and 0.97 respectively. The experimental results demonstrate that the Epi-SSA algorithm outperforms other methods in a variety of epistasis detection tasks. As the number of SNPs in the data set increases and the order of epistasis rises, the advantages of the Epi-SSA algorithm become increasingly pronounced.In addition, we applied Epi-SSA to the analysis of the WTCCC dataset, uncovering numerous genes and gene pairs that might play a significant role in the pathogenesis of seven complex diseases. It is worthy of note that some of these genes have been relatedly reported in the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD). Epi-SSA is a potent tool for detecting epistatic interactions, which aids us in further comprehending the pathogenesis of common and complex diseases. The source code of Epi-SSA can be obtained at https://osf.io/6sqwj/.
Suggested Citation
Liyan Sun & Jingwen Bian & Yi Xin & Linqing Jiang & Linxuan Zheng, 2024.
"Epi-SSA: A novel epistasis detection method based on a multi-objective sparrow search algorithm,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-31, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0311223
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311223
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0311223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.