IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0311077.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distinct risk groups with different healthcare barriers and acute care use exist in the U.S. population with chronic liver disease

Author

Listed:
  • Carrie R Wong
  • Catherine M Crespi
  • Beth Glenn
  • Steven-Huy B Han
  • James A Macinko
  • Roshan Bastani

Abstract

Background: The relationship between community-based healthcare barriers and risk of recurrent hospital-based care among persons with chronic liver disease (CLD) is understudied. We aimed to uncover distinct groups among adults in the United States with CLD based on healthcare barriers and risk-stratify recurrent acute care use by group. Methods: Using National Health Interview Survey (2011 to 2017) data, we performed latent class analysis (LCA) to uncover groups experiencing distinct sets of healthcare barriers. We assessed sociodemographic and health characteristics and probabilities of recurrent acute care use by group. Results: The sample included 5,062 (estimated 4.7 million) adults with CLD (median [range] age 55 [18–85]). LCA modeling differentiated 4 groups: minimal barriers (group 1) (n = 3,953; 78.1%), unaffordability (group 2) (n = 540; 10.7%), care delays (group 3) (n = 328; 6.5%), and inability to establish care (group 4) (n = 240; 4.8%). Group 2 had the most uninsured persons (n = 210; 38.9%), whereas group 3 was mostly insured (n = 305; 93.1%). Group 4 included the most adults under 65 years old (n = 220; 91.7%), females (n = 156; 65.1%), and persons with unemployment (n = 169; 70.6%) and poverty (n = 85; 35.3%). Compared to group 1, the likelihood of recurrent acute care use was highest for group 4 (aOR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.23–2.79 followed by group 3 (aOR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.07–2.11) and group 2 (aOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.11–1.97). Conclusion: US adults with CLD can be categorized into 4 distinct groups based on healthcare barriers, which are associated with different probabilities of recurrent acute care use. Findings from this study are important for future interventions to reduce potentially avoidable hospital-based care among the highest-risk persons with CLD.

Suggested Citation

  • Carrie R Wong & Catherine M Crespi & Beth Glenn & Steven-Huy B Han & James A Macinko & Roshan Bastani, 2024. "Distinct risk groups with different healthcare barriers and acute care use exist in the U.S. population with chronic liver disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0311077
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0311077
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0311077&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0311077?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0311077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.