IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0311022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Education level, contraceptive communication, and IUD use among rural-to-urban migrants in China: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Danielle Kane
  • Bing Han
  • Yu Chung

Abstract

Chinese rural-to-urban migrant workers have high rates of unintended pregnancy, yet many are reluctant to choose the most effective forms of contraception, such as IUDs (intrauterine devices). Those who do are often socioeconomically disadvantaged, a finding that contradicts much health research, namely that higher SES individuals can access better healthcare. This puzzle highlights the need to understand better migrant workers’ contraceptive decision-making. This paper reports findings from interviews with 91 migrant workers. Across educational backgrounds, IUD use usually followed contraceptive-related communication. Female interviewees with less education were more likely to have contraception-related discussions, including with doctors, in which the benefits of IUDs emerged. Typically, however, these conversations happened after a pregnancy. The findings suggest a need for public awareness campaigns that destigmatize discussion of contraception and interventions targeted by education level.

Suggested Citation

  • Danielle Kane & Bing Han & Yu Chung, 2024. "Education level, contraceptive communication, and IUD use among rural-to-urban migrants in China: A qualitative study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0311022
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0311022
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0311022&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0311022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0311022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.