IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0310937.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine learning for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth using early second and third trimester maternal blood gene expression: A cautionary tale

Author

Listed:
  • Kylie K Hornaday
  • Ty Werbicki
  • Suzanne C Tough
  • Stephen L Wood
  • David W Anderson
  • Constance H Li
  • Donna M Slater

Abstract

Spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) remains a significant global health challenge and a leading cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Despite advancements in neonatal care, the prediction of sPTB remains elusive, in part due to complex etiologies and heterogeneous patient populations. This study aimed to validate and extend information on gene expression biomarkers previously described for predicting sPTB using maternal whole blood from the All Our Families pregnancy cohort study based in Calgary, Canada. The results of this study are two-fold: first, using additional replicates of maternal blood samples from the All Our Families cohort, we were unable to repeat the findings of a 2016 study which identified top maternal gene expression predictors for sPTB. Second, we conducted a secondary analysis of the original gene expression dataset from the 2016 study using five modelling approaches (random forest, elastic net regression, unregularized logistic regression, L2-regularized logistic regression, and multilayer perceptron neural network) followed by external validation using a pregnancy cohort based in Detroit, USA. The top performing model (random forest classification) suggested promising performance (area under the receiver operating curve, AUROC 0.99 in the training set), but performance was significantly degraded on the test set (AUROC 0.54) and further degraded in external validation (AUROC 0.50), suggesting poor generalizability, likely due to overfitting exacerbated by a low feature-to-noise ratio. Similar performance was observed in the other four learning models. Prediction was not improved when using higher complexity machine learning (e.g., neural network) approaches over traditional statistical learning (e.g., logistic regression). These findings underscore the challenges in translating biomarker discovery into clinically useful predictive models for sPTB. This study highlights the critical need for rigorous methodological safeguards and external validation in biomarker research. It also emphasizes the impact of data noise and overfitting on model performance, particularly in high-dimensional omics datasets. Future research should prioritize robust validation strategies and explore mechanistic insights to improve our understanding and prediction of sPTB.

Suggested Citation

  • Kylie K Hornaday & Ty Werbicki & Suzanne C Tough & Stephen L Wood & David W Anderson & Constance H Li & Donna M Slater, 2025. "Machine learning for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth using early second and third trimester maternal blood gene expression: A cautionary tale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0310937
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0310937
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0310937&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0310937?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0310937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.