IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0310829.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative study of machine learning approaches integrated with genetic algorithm for IVF success prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Shirin Dehghan
  • Reza Rabiei
  • Hamid Choobineh
  • Keivan Maghooli
  • Mozhdeh Nazari
  • Mojtaba Vahidi-Asl

Abstract

Introduction: IVF is a widely-used assisted reproductive technology with a consistent success rate of around 30%, and improving this rate is crucial due to emotional, financial, and health-related implications for infertile couples. This study aimed to develop a model for predicting IVF outcome by comparing five machine-learning techniques. Method: The research approached five prominent machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest, Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Recursive Partitioning and Regression Trees (RPART), and AdaBoost, in the context of IVF success prediction. The study also incorporated GA as a feature selection method to enhance the predictive models’ robustness. Results: Findings demonstrate that AdaBoost, particularly when combined with GA feature selection, achieved the highest accuracy rate of 89.8%. Using GA, Random Forest also demonstrated strong performance, achieving an accuracy rate of 87.4%. Genetic Algorithm significantly improved the performance of all classifiers, emphasizing the importance of feature selection. Ten crucial features, including female age, AMH, endometrial thickness, sperm count, and various indicators of oocyte and embryo quality, were identified as key determinants of IVF success. Conclusion: These findings underscore the potential of machine learning and feature selection techniques to assist IVF clinicians in providing more accurate predictions, enabling tailored treatment plans for each patient. Future research and validation can further enhance the practicality and reliability of these predictive models in clinical IVF practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Shirin Dehghan & Reza Rabiei & Hamid Choobineh & Keivan Maghooli & Mozhdeh Nazari & Mojtaba Vahidi-Asl, 2024. "Comparative study of machine learning approaches integrated with genetic algorithm for IVF success prediction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0310829
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0310829
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0310829&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0310829?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuting Yang & Golrokh Mirzaei, 2024. "Performance analysis of data resampling on class imbalance and classification techniques on multi-omics data for cancer classification," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(2), pages 1-17, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0310829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.