IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0310771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In search of prosociality in rodents: A scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Valérie Charron
  • Joey Talbot
  • Patrick R Labelle
  • Anne T M Konkle
  • Hélène Plamondon

Abstract

Studying prosociality in rodents can provide insight into brain mechanisms potentially related to neurodevelopmental disorders known to impact social behaviors (e.g., autism spectrum disorder). While many studies have been published suggesting promising models, current knowledge remains scattered, including potential factors mediating prosocial behaviors in rodents. Prosocial behavior is characterized by an action done to benefit another or promote their well-being. The goal of this scoping review is to characterize current findings regarding prosocial paradigms in rodents, highlight current gaps in reporting, and identify factors shown to be important in mediating prosocial responses in rodents. Five databases were consulted in search of relevant studies published between 2000 and 2020 (APA PsycInfo, Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science). An update using a semi-supervised machine learning approach (ASReview) was then conducted to collect studies from 2021–2023. In total, 80 articles were included. Findings were the following: (1) Three categories of prosocial paradigm were extracted: cooperation, helping, and sharing tasks, (2) Rodents showed the ability to perform prosocial actions in all three categories, (3) Significant gaps in reported methodologies (e.g., failure to report animals’ characteristics, housing conditions, and/or experimental protocol) and mediating factors (e.g., sex, strain, housing, food restriction) were found, and (4) Behaviors are determinant when investigating prosociality in rodents, however many studies omitted to include such analyses. Together these results inform future studies on the impact of mediating factors and the importance of behavioral analyses on the expression of prosocial behaviors in rodents.

Suggested Citation

  • Valérie Charron & Joey Talbot & Patrick R Labelle & Anne T M Konkle & Hélène Plamondon, 2024. "In search of prosociality in rodents: A scoping review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-32, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0310771
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0310771
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0310771&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0310771?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ferdinands, Gerbrich & Schram, Raoul & de Bruin, Jonathan & Bagheri, Ayoub & Oberski, Daniel Leonard & Tummers, Lars & van de Schoot, Rens, 2020. "Active learning for screening prioritization in systematic reviews - A simulation study," OSF Preprints w6qbg, Center for Open Science.
    2. repec:osf:osfxxx:w6qbg_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bo Liu & Wei Song & Zhan Meng & Xinwei Liu, 2023. "Review of Land Use Change Detection—A Method Combining Machine Learning and Bibliometric Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Vittoria Ardito & Ludovico Cavallaro & Michael Drummond & Oriana Ciani, 2024. "Mapping Payment and Pricing Schemes for Health Innovation: Protocol of a Scoping Literature Review," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 8(5), pages 765-772, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0310771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.