IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0310736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mirvetuximab Soravtansine in solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Shamsnur Rehim
  • Shuang Yuan
  • Hongjing Wang

Abstract

Background: Mirvetuximab Soravtansine (MIRV) is a promising antibody‒drug conjugate (ADC) that targets folate receptor alpha (FRα), which is overexpressed in several types of solid tumors. In November 2022, MIRV was approved in the USA for the treatment of adult patients with FRα-positive, platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer who received 1–3 prior systemic treatment regimens. Therefore, high-quality evidence for its efficacy and safety in different cancers is urgently needed. Methods: A systematic search (e.g., PubMed, Embase, Web Of Science, Cochrane Library) was conducted to identify all relevant clinical trials of MIRV alone or in combination with chemo- and/or target-therapies in solid tumors. The primary end-point was median progression-free survival (mPFS). The secondary endpoints were the Objective response rate (ORR) and adverse effects (AEs). A random-effects model was applied. Results: The study included nine research studies with a total of 682 patients. The pooled mPFS and pooled ORR were 6.70 months (95% CI 4.54–8.86, I2 = 96.21%) and 36% (95% CI: 28% to 44%, I2 = 76.79%), respectively. Significant differences were observed among intervention regimens and response to platinum. The pooled mPFS of MIRV monotherapy and MIRV+ Bevacizumab (BEV) combined therapy was 4.28 (95% CI 3.90–4.65, I2 = 0.00%) and 7.78 (95% CI 6.62–8.95, I2 = 0.00%), respectively. The pooled ORRs of MIRV monotherapy and MIRV+BEV combined therapy were 25% (95% CI 21%–29%, I2 = 25.20%) and 43% (95% CI 36%–50%, I2 = 0.01%), respectively. The pooled ORRs of the platinum-sensitive, platinum-resistant groups were 59% (95% CI 36%–81%, I2 = 61.88%), 33% (95% CI 25%–40%, I2 = 69.73%), respectively. In addition, we conducted supplementary subgroup analyses to explore the influence of FRα receptor expression levels and the number of prior treatments on treatment outcomes. The most common adverse effects were blurred vision (45.20%), nausea (40.13%), diarrhea (39.52%), fatigue (33.84%) and keratopathy (31.20%). Conclusions: MIRV has significant therapeutic effects in solid tumors, especially when combined with BEV. In platinum-tolerant tumors, the efficacy of MIRV is also considerable. Overall, MIRV is relatively safe in solid tumors, and adverse reactions are relatively rare and mild.

Suggested Citation

  • Shamsnur Rehim & Shuang Yuan & Hongjing Wang, 2024. "Mirvetuximab Soravtansine in solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0310736
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310736
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0310736
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0310736&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0310736?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0310736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.