IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0310673.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlates of COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs in Japan: A cross-sectional study of 28,175 residents

Author

Listed:
  • Yukihiro Sato
  • Ichiro Kawachi
  • Yasuaki Saijo
  • Eiji Yoshioka
  • Ken Osaka
  • Takahiro Tabuchi

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with an increase in conspiracy theories worldwide. However, in Japan, the prevalence of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs has remained unclear. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence and correlates of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs using a survey of 28,175 residents of Japan aged 16–81 years old. Methods: A cross-sectional self-administered survey was conducted from September to October 2021. To assess the number of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, we used three questions from the Oxford Coronavirus Explanations, Attitudes, and Narratives Survey. Independent variables included general vaccine conspiracy beliefs, sociodemographic variables, information sources for COVID-19, trust in authorities, and fear of COVID-19. Results: After applying sampling weights and imputation, the estimated prevalence of holding at least one COVID-19 conspiracy belief was 24.4%. From a linear regression model, several factors were independently associated with conspiracy beliefs. Notably, people with the lowest level of education (lower secondary school) endorsed fewer COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs (B -0.089, vs. upper secondary school). Furthermore, higher socioeconomic backgrounds–such as higher income, higher wealth, and regular employment–were associated with endorsing conspiracy beliefs. Only 37.3% of respondents trusted the government of Japan, but paradoxically, trust in the government was positively associated with conspiracy beliefs (B 0.175, vs. distrust). Conclusions: COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs can be prevalent in about a quarter of the residents of Japan. Certain groups are more likely to endorse conspiracy beliefs, and targeting interventions towards these groups might be efficient in stemming the spread of conspiracy beliefs.

Suggested Citation

  • Yukihiro Sato & Ichiro Kawachi & Yasuaki Saijo & Eiji Yoshioka & Ken Osaka & Takahiro Tabuchi, 2024. "Correlates of COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs in Japan: A cross-sectional study of 28,175 residents," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0310673
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0310673
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0310673&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0310673?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fujio Toriumi & Takeshi Sakaki & Tetsuro Kobayashi & Mitsuo Yoshida, 2024. "Anti-vaccine rabbit hole leads to political representation: the case of Twitter in Japan," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 405-423, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0310673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.