IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0310631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the structural stability of partial cable-stayed bridges with multiple towers and high piers during construction

Author

Listed:
  • Chenglong Zhu
  • Lingbo Wang
  • Yixiang Liu
  • Lin Kang
  • Xinjun Guo
  • Xiaobo Zheng

Abstract

To clarify the structural safety and stability of partial cable-stayed bridges with multiple towers and high piers during the construction stage, a finite element analysis model of the entire construction process was established using a five-tower, six-span, partial cable-stayed bridge in Shaanxi Province, China, as the engineering background. Linear elasticity and nonlinear stability analyses were carried out in the following key construction stages: bare tower construction, maximum cantilever construction without cables, maximum cantilever construction with cables, side-span closure, secondary mid-span closure, mid-span closure, and second-phase paving. A sensitivity analysis of the structural parameters (the main tower stiffness, main pier stiffness, and main beam stiffness) was conducted. Furthermore, the impacts of the combination of the reduction of the main pier stiffness with two unfavorable factors (the detachment of the construction hanging basket and asymmetric construction on both sides of the main beam) on the construction safety and stability of the structure were explored. The results show that the stability coefficient of the structure during the entire construction process met the requirements of the corresponding specifications; the linear elastic stability coefficient at each stage was greater than 4.0, and the nonlinear stability coefficient was greater than 2.5. Moreover, the stability coefficient was found to be the smallest at the stage of maximum cantilever construction with cables, which was thus identified as the most unfavorable construction stage. The instability mode at each construction stage was found to be the longitudinal instability of the main pier. The structural parameter sensitivity analysis revealed that the change in the stiffness of the main pier had the greatest impact on structural stability, and the structural safety factor was found to be proportional to the stiffness of the main pier. Furthermore, the effects of multiple factors were found to intersect; under the combination of the reduction of the main pier stiffness with the two unfavorable factors, the stability coefficient of the structure was found to be greatly reduced by more than 15%. Therefore, during the construction of partial cable-stayed bridges with multiple towers and high piers, the stage of maximum cantilever construction with cables should be of primary focus, the maintenance and management of the piers should be strengthened, and the unfavorable factors should be avoided. The results of this study can provide a reference for the construction and design of similar types of bridges.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenglong Zhu & Lingbo Wang & Yixiang Liu & Lin Kang & Xinjun Guo & Xiaobo Zheng, 2024. "Study on the structural stability of partial cable-stayed bridges with multiple towers and high piers during construction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-25, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0310631
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0310631
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0310631&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0310631?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0310631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.