IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0310416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and validation of a risk prediction model for severe postoperative complications in elderly patients with hip fracture

Author

Listed:
  • Zhihui Wei
  • Lian Jiang
  • Minghua Zhang
  • Xiao Chen

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate risk factors associated with severe postoperative complications following hip fracture surgery in elderly patients and to develop a nomogram-based risk prediction model for these complications. Methods: A total of 627 elderly patients with hip fractures treated at Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2015 to April 2024 were collected. 439 patients were assigned to the training cohort for model development, and 188 to the validation cohort for model assessment. The training cohort was stratified based on the presence or absence of severe complications. We employed LASSO regression, as well as univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, to identify significant factors. A nomogram was constructed based on the outcomes of the multivariate regression. The model’s discriminative ability was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), while calibration plots and decision curve analysis (DCA) evaluated its calibration and stability. Internal validation was performed using the validation cohort. Results: Out of the 627 patients, 118 (18.82%) experienced severe postoperative complications. Both LASSO regression and multivariate logistic analysis identified the modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5) and the preoperative C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) as significant predictors of severe complications. The nomogram model, derived from the multivariate analysis, exhibited strong discriminative ability, with an AUC of 0.963 (95% CI: 0.946–0.980) for the training cohort and 0.963 (95% CI: 0.938–0.988) for the validation cohort. Calibration plots demonstrated excellent agreement between the nomogram’s predictions and actual outcomes. Decision curve analysis (DCA) indicated that the model provided clinical utility across all patient scenarios. These findings were consistent in the validation cohort. Conclusions: Both the mFI-5 and CAR are predictive factors for severe postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhihui Wei & Lian Jiang & Minghua Zhang & Xiao Chen, 2024. "Development and validation of a risk prediction model for severe postoperative complications in elderly patients with hip fracture," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0310416
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0310416
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0310416&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0310416?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0310416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.