IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0310378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

University students’ health-related quality of life and its determinants. Results from a cross-sectional survey during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Karoline Wagner
  • Zoë Reinhardt
  • Sarah Negash
  • Lena Weber
  • Andreas Wienke
  • Rafael Mikolajczyk
  • Amand Führer

Abstract

Being a university student is a vulnerable period marked by transitions and uncertainties which can impair their physical and mental well-being as well as overall quality of life. The existing literature suggests that certain groups of students might be particularly affected by that. In addition, quality of life might have been further affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, this article investigated university students’ quality of life and its determinants during the COVID-19 pandemic using an online survey among students of one German university. Quality of life was measured using SF-12’s physical (PCS) and mental dimension (MCS). We conducted stratified descriptive analyses followed by regression analyses. 875 respondents completed the questionnaire, of whom 63.0% were female and 95.7% had a German nationality and 16.0% reported having a migration background. Mean age was 23 years. Medical (17.7%) and law students (15.8%) were the biggest groups, but all other faculties of the university were also covered. Concerning respondents’ health-related quality of life, mean PCS was 51 (95%CI = (47–55)), while mean MCS was 36 (95%CI = (30–43). Students with non-German nationality (PCS: 49; MCS: 29) and students with migration background (PCS: 50; MCS: 31) showed particularly low quality of life in the mental dimension. In multivariable regression analyses, associations of the included determinants with PCS were rather weak. In contrast, there were strong associations between MCS and having a migration background with regression coefficient β = -26.1 (95%CI = (-38.5 – -13.7)) and studying Law with β = -17.7 (95%CI = (-28.2 – -7.2)). When comparing these findings with pre-pandemic studies, it seems that university students’ quality of life during the pandemic was as low as it had been before while–as in pre-pandemic studies–certain groups of students generally fared worse than others did. This suggests that universities should actively promote students’ health and should implement measures to specifically support particularly vulnerable students such as students with migration background or students of certain subjects.

Suggested Citation

  • Karoline Wagner & Zoë Reinhardt & Sarah Negash & Lena Weber & Andreas Wienke & Rafael Mikolajczyk & Amand Führer, 2025. "University students’ health-related quality of life and its determinants. Results from a cross-sectional survey during the COVID-19 pandemic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0310378
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0310378
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0310378&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0310378?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0310378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.