Author
Listed:
- Shigeaki Higashiyama
- Yutaka Katayama
- Atsushi Yoshida
- Nahoko Inoue
- Takashi Yamanaga
- Takao Ichida
- Yukio Miki
- Joji Kawabe
Abstract
Background: In nuclear medicine, normalized mean square error (NMSE) is widely used for image quality evaluation and machine adjustment. However, evaluating clinical images in nuclear medicine using NMSE necessitates acquiring a reference image, which is time consuming and impractical. Therefore, it is necessary to explore no-reference metrics, such as perception-based image quality evaluator (PIQE) and natural image quality evaluator (NIQE), as alternatives for evaluating the quality of clinical images used in nuclear medicine. Purpose: To examine whether no-reference metrics can be applied to image quality evaluations for clinical images in nuclear medicine. Methods: Images of the Hoffman Brain Phantom containing 18F–fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) were obtained using Biograph Vision (Siemens Co., Ltd). From the collected images, 14 images with varying pixel counts and acquisition times were created. Sixteen images were visually evaluated by five image experts and ranked accordingly. Image quality was assessed using NMSE, PIQE, and NIQE, and rankings were calculated based on these scores. Results: The Spearman’s significance test revealed a strong correlation between image quality evaluations using PIQE and visual evaluations by specialists (p
Suggested Citation
Shigeaki Higashiyama & Yutaka Katayama & Atsushi Yoshida & Nahoko Inoue & Takashi Yamanaga & Takao Ichida & Yukio Miki & Joji Kawabe, 2024.
"Investigation of the effectiveness of no-reference metric in image evaluation in nuclear medicine,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-23, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0310305
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310305
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0310305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.