IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0310289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictors of successful weaning from veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO): A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Henry R Hsu
  • Praba Sekhar
  • Jahnavi Grover
  • David H Tian
  • Ciaran Downey
  • Ben Maudlin
  • Chathuri Dissanayake
  • Mark Dennis

Abstract

Background: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) use to support patients in cardiac failure is increasing. Despite this increased use, predicting successful weaning from ECMO can be challenging, no uniform guidelines on weaning exist. Therefore, we completed a systematic review to evaluate prognostic factors that predict successful weaning from V-A ECMO. Methods: Following the PRIMSA guidelines, a systematic literature search of Medline, Embase, SCOPUS and CENTRAL identified original research studies of patients requiring V-A ECMO where weaning was attempted. Data was collected on demographic factors and weaning protocol, biomarkers, haemodynamic, echocardiographic factors for the successfully weaned (SW) and not successfully weaned (NSW) groups. Two investigators reviewed studies for relevance, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the ROBINS-I tool. The study was registered on the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO ID# CRD42022366153). Results: 1219 records were screened, of which 20 studies were deemed sufficient to be included in the statistical analysis based on pre-specified criteria. Factors associated with successful weaning were higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (MD 9.0, 95% CI 4.1–13.8; p

Suggested Citation

  • Henry R Hsu & Praba Sekhar & Jahnavi Grover & David H Tian & Ciaran Downey & Ben Maudlin & Chathuri Dissanayake & Mark Dennis, 2025. "Predictors of successful weaning from veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO): A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0310289
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0310289
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0310289&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0310289?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0310289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.