IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0309981.html

Differences between oscillometry measurements obtained by MostGraph-01 and MasterScreen-IOS in patients with asthma

Author

Listed:
  • Sonoko Harada
  • Norihiro Harada
  • Hitoshi Sasano
  • Yuki Tanabe
  • Masaki Kotajima
  • Yoshihiko Sato
  • Tomohito Takeshige
  • Yoko Katsura
  • Jun Ito
  • Ryo Atsuta
  • Hajime Kurosawa
  • Kazuhisa Takahashi

Abstract

Background: Oscillometry devices (also termed forced oscillation technique) devices such as MasterScreen-IOS® (Jaeger, Hochberg, Germany) and MostGraph-01® (Chest, Tokyo, Japan) are useful for obtaining physiological assessments in patients with obstructive lung diseases, including asthma. However, as oscillometry measurements have not been fully compared between MasterScreen-IOS® and MostGraph-01® in patients with asthma, it is unknown whether there are differences in the measurements between the devices. This study aimed to determine whether there is any difference in oscillometry measurements obtained using the two devices in patients with asthma. Methods: Oscillometry measurements obtained using MasterScreen-IOS® and MostGraph-01® were retrospectively evaluated in 95 patients with asthma at Juntendo University Hospital between October 2009 and November 2009. Results: There was a strong positive correlation in the measurements between the two devices. However, the values of R5, R20, ALX and Fres were lower when measured with MostGraph-01® than with MasterScreen-IOS®, and vice versa for the values of X5. The results were used in correction equations to convert oscillometry parameters measured using MasterScreen-IOS® to those measured using MostGraph-01®. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first report to compare MostGraph-01® and MasterScreen-IOS® devices using practical clinical data obtained in patients with asthma. The values obtained by both devices can be interpreted in a similar way, although there is slight variation. The conversion equations produced in this study may assist to compare the oscillometry measurements obtained by each of the two devices.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonoko Harada & Norihiro Harada & Hitoshi Sasano & Yuki Tanabe & Masaki Kotajima & Yoshihiko Sato & Tomohito Takeshige & Yoko Katsura & Jun Ito & Ryo Atsuta & Hajime Kurosawa & Kazuhisa Takahashi, 2024. "Differences between oscillometry measurements obtained by MostGraph-01 and MasterScreen-IOS in patients with asthma," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309981
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309981
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309981&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0309981?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.