IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0309914.html

Beyond the healthcare system: The societal and contextual factors impacting parents’ participation in decision-making for neonates with life-threatening conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Fatemeh Oskouie
  • Sedigheh Khanjari
  • Marjan Banazadeh

Abstract

Background: Parents of neonates with life-threatening conditions and professionals, bear the burden of making complex decisions. Parents may not be fully involved in decision-making, and there is a paucity of evidence regarding the influence of social context on parents’ participation. We aimed to explore factors that extended beyond the healthcare system and impacted parents’ participation in decision-making for neonates with life-threatening conditions. Materials and methods: This qualitative research was carried out in 2019 in four level-III Iranian NICUs, (neonatal intensive care units) where twenty-three face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted, transcribed, and analyzed using a conventional content analysis technique. Interviews were condensed into meaningful units during the coding phase, resulting in 206 open codes. These codes were then categorized into eleven categories based on commonalities and distinctions. This iterative process continued until 4 main subcategories were established. Results: The main categories and sub-categories were “unmodified regulations according to the neonatology advances” (lack of regulations to modify ineffective treatments, lack of a legally documented do not resuscitate order, lack of a defined regional neonatal viability threshold, and lack of maternal guardianship of child medical care), “deficiencies of the health insurance system” (covering the cost of ineffective treatments and lack of insurance covering for palliative care services), “treatment-oriented culture in society” (expecting a miracle for medical science, difficult acceptance of neonatal death and difficult acceptance of home death), and “physician-oriented culture in society” (excessive respect for physicians’ decision-making eligibility and social position of physicians). Conclusion: The findings revealed concepts surrounding parents’ participation in decision-making for life-threatening conditions neonates are influenced by social, legal, cultural, and financial aspects. To bridge the gap between healthcare professionals’ attitudes and cultural and religious beliefs, fatwas, and laws, a collaborative approach is necessary. To address the complex challenges of decision-making for these neonates, involving stakeholders like clinicians, legal experts, Islamic scholars, sociologists, jurists, judges, and medical ethicists is crucial for modifying laws to align with neonatology advancements.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatemeh Oskouie & Sedigheh Khanjari & Marjan Banazadeh, 2024. "Beyond the healthcare system: The societal and contextual factors impacting parents’ participation in decision-making for neonates with life-threatening conditions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309914
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309914
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309914&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0309914?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.