IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0309883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of the Ward Nurses’ Perspective-taking of the Staff Receiving Discharged Patients Scale: An observational study of ward nurses

Author

Listed:
  • Shingo Tanaka
  • Masatoshi Saiki
  • Yukie Takemura

Abstract

Introduction: Discharge planning involves coordinating between different care settings. Failed coordination can lead to delayed care at the facilities receiving discharged patients. Nurses who implement discharge planning must consider the circumstances of the staff receiving the discharged patients. Objective: This study aims to develop a nurses’ perspective-taking scale for measuring the cognitive process of imagining a staff’s situation when receiving discharged patients. Methods: An online survey was conducted from September to November 2021 with nurses in Japanese acute care hospitals, using a 20-item questionnaire based on interviews and a literature review. Item reduction was conducted based on inter-item correlations, item-total correlations, and exploratory factor analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed. For the exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, the samples were randomly split in half and tested. Cronbach’s alpha, intraclass correlation coefficients, and correlation coefficients were calculated using both self-developed and pre-existing measures. Results: The questionnaire was distributed to 1,289 individuals, and 416 valid responses were obtained. Item reduction and exploratory factor analysis resulted in a 10-item scale with two subscales, “imagine-other” (six items), which is imagining the other person’s situation, and “imagine-self” (four items), which is imagining oneself in the other person’s situation. The goodness-of-fit indices were as follows: comparative fit index, 0.95; root mean square error of approximation, 0.08; and standardized root mean squared residual, 0.06. Correlation coefficients with existing scales were 0.38, 0.57, and -0.33. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.89, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.54. Conclusion: The newly developed scale proved to be reliable, valid, and suitable for use. This scale can measure the degree of perspective-taking by nurses, which can improve collaboration between facilities and the effectiveness of discharge planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Shingo Tanaka & Masatoshi Saiki & Yukie Takemura, 2024. "Development of the Ward Nurses’ Perspective-taking of the Staff Receiving Discharged Patients Scale: An observational study of ward nurses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309883
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309883
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309883&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0309883?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eiko Moriya & Noriko Nagao & Shinya Ito & Miyuki Makaya, 2020. "The relationship between perceived difficulty and reflection in the practice of discharge planning nurses in acute care hospitals: A nationwide observational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3-4), pages 511-524, February.
    2. Elias David Lundereng & Alfhild Dihle & Simen A. Steindal, 2020. "Nurses’ experiences and perspectives on collaborative discharge planning when patients receiving palliative care for cancer are discharged home from hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3382-3391, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eleandro Prado & Sonia Marcon & Luciana Kalinke & Marcelle da Silva & Mayckel Barreto & Angelica Takemoto & Marcela Birolim & Carlos Laranjeira, 2022. "Meanings and Experiences of End-of-Life Patients and Their Family Caregivers in Hospital-to-Home Transitions: A Constructivist Grounded Theory Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-16, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.