IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0309862.html

Optimising window size of semantic of classification model for identification of in-text citations based on context and intent

Author

Listed:
  • Arshad Iqbal
  • Abdul Shahid
  • Muhammad Roman
  • Muhammad Tanvir Afzal
  • Umair ul Hassan

Abstract

Citations in scientific literature act as channels for the sharing, transfer, and development of scientific knowledge. However, not all citations hold the same significance. Numerous taxonomies and machine learning models have been developed to analyze citations, but they often overlook the internal context of these citations. Moreover, it is worth noting that selecting the appropriate word embedding and classification models is crucial for achieving superior results. Word embeddings offer n-dimensional distributed representations of text, striving to capture the nuanced meanings of words. Deep learning-based word embedding techniques have garnered significant attention and found application in various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, including text classification, sentiment analysis, and citation analysis. Current state-of-the-art techniques often use small datasets with fixed window sizes, resulting in the loss of contextual meaning. This study leverages two benchmark datasets encompassing a substantial volume of in-text citations to guide the selection of an optimal word embedding window size and classification approaches. A comparative analysis of various window sizes for in-text citations is conducted to identify crucial citations effectively. Additionally, Word2Vec embedding is employed in conjunction with deep learning models and machine learning models such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, Support Vector Machines (SVM), Decision Trees, and Naive Bayes.The evaluation employs precision, recall, F1-score, and accuracy metrics for each combination of window sizes. The findings reveal that, particularly for lengthy in-text citations, larger citation windows are more adept at capturing the semantic essence of the references. Within the scope of this study, window sizes of 10 achieve superior accuracy and precision with both machine and deep learning models.

Suggested Citation

  • Arshad Iqbal & Abdul Shahid & Muhammad Roman & Muhammad Tanvir Afzal & Umair ul Hassan, 2025. "Optimising window size of semantic of classification model for identification of in-text citations based on context and intent," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-28, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309862
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309862
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309862&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0309862?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tong Zeng & Daniel E. Acuna, 2020. "Modeling citation worthiness by using attention-based bidirectional long short-term memory networks and interpretable models," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 399-428, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Faiza Qayyum & Harun Jamil & Naeem Iqbal & DoHyeun Kim & Muhammad Tanvir Afzal, 2022. "Toward potential hybrid features evaluation using MLP-ANN binary classification model to tackle meaningful citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6471-6499, November.
    2. Xin An & Xin Sun & Shuo Xu, 2022. "Important citations identification with semi-supervised classification model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6533-6555, November.
    3. Jianhua Hou & Bili Zheng & Hao Li & Wenjing Li, 2025. "Evolution and impact of the science of science: from theoretical analysis to digital-AI driven research," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.