IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0309843.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and validation of a cardiovascular risk prediction model for Sri Lankans using machine learning

Author

Listed:
  • Chamila Mettananda
  • Isuru Sanjeewa
  • Tinul Benthota Arachchi
  • Avishka Wijesooriya
  • Chiranjaya Chandrasena
  • Tolani Weerasinghe
  • Maheeka Solangaarachchige
  • Achila Ranasinghe
  • Isuru Elpitiya
  • Rashmi Sammandapperuma
  • Sujeewani Kurukulasooriya
  • Udaya Ranawaka
  • Arunasalam Pathmeswaran
  • Anuradhini Kasturiratne
  • Nei Kato
  • Rajitha Wickramasinghe
  • Prasanna Haddela
  • Janaka de Silva

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Sri Lankans do not have a specific cardiovascular (CV) risk prediction model and therefore, World Health Organization(WHO) risk charts developed for the Southeast Asia Region are being used. We aimed to develop a CV risk prediction model specific for Sri Lankans using machine learning (ML) of data of a population-based, randomly selected cohort of Sri Lankans followed up for 10 years and to validate it in an external cohort. Material and methods: The cohort consisted of 2596 individuals between 40–65 years of age in 2007, who were followed up for 10 years. Of them, 179 developed hard CV diseases (CVD) by 2017. We developed three CV risk prediction models named model 1, 2 and 3 using ML. We compared predictive performances between models and the WHO risk charts using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). The most predictive and practical model for use in primary care, model 3 was named “SLCVD score” which used age, sex, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, history of diabetes, and total cholesterol level in the calculation. We developed an online platform to calculate the SLCVD score. Predictions of SLCVD score were validated in an external hospital-based cohort. Results: Model 1, 2, SLCVD score and the WHO risk charts predicted 173, 162, 169 and 10 of 179 observed events and the area under the ROC (AUC) were 0.98, 0.98, 0.98 and 0.52 respectively. During external validation, the SLCVD score and WHO risk charts predicted 56 and 18 respectively of 119 total events and AUCs were 0.64 and 0.54 respectively. Conclusions: SLCVD score is the first and only CV risk prediction model specific for Sri Lankans. It predicts the 10-year risk of developing a hard CVD in Sri Lankans. SLCVD score was more effective in predicting Sri Lankans at high CV risk than WHO risk charts.

Suggested Citation

  • Chamila Mettananda & Isuru Sanjeewa & Tinul Benthota Arachchi & Avishka Wijesooriya & Chiranjaya Chandrasena & Tolani Weerasinghe & Maheeka Solangaarachchige & Achila Ranasinghe & Isuru Elpitiya & Ras, 2024. "Development and validation of a cardiovascular risk prediction model for Sri Lankans using machine learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309843
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309843
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309843&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0309843?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.