IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0309328.html

Recognition of the game situation in baseball

Author

Listed:
  • Yasuhiro Hashimoto
  • Hiroshi Takahashi
  • Hiromu Nagaura
  • Shinji Yoshitake
  • Hiroki Nakata

Abstract

This study examines baseball players’ recognition framework of out, ball, and strike counts in baseball games and clarifies the differences in psychological perspectives between batters and pitchers. The participants were 396 players (294 batters and 102 pitchers) belonging to baseball clubs at eight universities. Participants answered 288 questions for all game situations by combining out, ball, and strike counts and runner position. The advantages for batters or pitchers were evaluated using a 7-point Likert scale (from very advantageous for batters to very advantageous for pitchers). Factor analysis indicated four significant factors (36 items): “Batter’s advantage count,” “Pitcher’s advantage count,” “2 out young count,” and “0 out young count.” In a direct comparison of these factors between batters and pitchers, batters were more aware of their advantage over pitchers in the factors “Batter’s advantage count” and “0 out young count” and disadvantage in the “Pitcher’s advantage count.” Significant differences in recognition of these factors were observed between batters and pitchers. Batters were more susceptible to game situations than were pitchers. Our findings suggest that baseball players recognize several types of game situations, although not an infinite number.

Suggested Citation

  • Yasuhiro Hashimoto & Hiroshi Takahashi & Hiromu Nagaura & Shinji Yoshitake & Hiroki Nakata, 2024. "Recognition of the game situation in baseball," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309328
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309328
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309328&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0309328?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George R. Lindsey, 1963. "An Investigation of Strategies in Baseball," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 477-501, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michal Friesl & Liam J. A. Lenten & Jan Libich & Petr Stehlík, 2017. "In search of goals: increasing ice hockey’s attractiveness by a sides swap," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(9), pages 1006-1018, September.
    2. Wittkowski Knut M. & Song Tingting & Anderson Kent & Daniels John E., 2008. "U-Scores for Multivariate Data in Sports," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 4(3), pages 1-24, July.
    3. J. Eric Bickel, 2009. "On the Decision to Take a Pitch," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 186-193, September.
    4. M B Wright, 2009. "50 years of OR in sport," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 161-168, May.
    5. Michael J. Fry & Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, 2012. "Introduction to the Special Issue on Analytics in Sports, Part I: General Sports Applications," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 105-108, April.
    6. Hamrick Jeff & Rasp John, 2011. "Using Local Correlation to Explain Success in Baseball," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 7(4), pages 1-29, October.
    7. David J. Berri & John Charles Bradbury, 2010. "Working in the Land of the Metricians," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 11(1), pages 29-47, February.
    8. Ryan Pinheiro & Stefan Szymanski, 2022. "All Runs Are Created Equal: Labor Market Efficiency in Major League Baseball," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 23(8), pages 1046-1075, December.
    9. Michal Friesl & Jan Libich & Petr Stehlík, 2020. "Fixing ice hockey’s low scoring flip side? Just flip the sides," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 27-45, September.
    10. Sherer, Peter D., 2017. "When is it time to stop doing the same old thing? How institutional and organizational entrepreneurs changed Major League Baseball," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 355-370.
    11. Hirotsu Nobuyoshi & Bickel J. Eric, 2019. "Using a Markov decision process to model the value of the sacrifice bunt," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 15(4), pages 327-344, December.
    12. Young Lee, 2011. "Is the small-ball strategy effective in winning games? A stochastic frontier production approach," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 51-59, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.