IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0309254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perception of People Living with HIV and Healthcare Workers on Differentiated Service Delivery Programs in Nigeria: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Johnbaptist Ezenduka
  • Peter Nwaokennaya
  • Gbenga Benjamin Obasa
  • Geoffrey Ogbeke
  • Ogonna Onuorah
  • Lawal Abubakar
  • Adebobola Bashorun
  • Ginigeme Ogochukwu
  • Emerenini Franklin
  • Adewale Akinjeji

Abstract

Nigeria, home to approximately 1.9 million people living with HIV (PLHIV), faces significant challenges in providing adequate care and treatment to the teeming number of PLHIV, particularly following the adoption of the ‘test and treat’ policy and the HIV ‘SURGE’ initiative. The Differentiated Service Delivery (DSD) model was introduced to address the increased burden on the healthcare system, offering patient-centered care through diverse methods like community-based care, fast-track drug refills, and task-shifting to lower-level healthcare providers. This study, conducted by the National AIDS and STI Control Program (NASCP) in collaboration with ICAP at Columbia University, evaluates the perspectives of healthcare workers and PLHIV on DSD programs in Nigeria.This is a qualitative study involving key informant interviews (KIIs) with 12 healthcare workers and focus group discussions (FGDs) with 153 PLHIV across four Nigerian states (Anambra, Kaduna, Lagos, Taraba). Healthcare workers with at least one year of ART service experience and PLHIV on ART for at least one year with suppressed viral loads were included in the study. Data was analyzed using an inductive, thematic approach to identify emergent patterns and themes. The study revealed that DSD models, such as peer-led Facility ART groups and community pharmacy ART refills, were widely implemented. The primary factors influencing the deployment of DSD models included client convenience and the need to alleviate healthcare worker load. Positive experiences with DSD were associated with convenience, confidentiality, and affordability, whereas negative perceptions stemmed from high service costs, poor healthcare worker attitudes, and confidentiality concerns. Additionally, the study highlighted the necessity for continuous training of healthcare workers, engagement with PLHIV, and increased awareness programs to improve DSD service delivery. Overall, the study underscores the importance of addressing financial barriers, enhancing healthcare worker training, and ensuring confidentiality in optimizing DSD models and improving HIV care outcomes in Nigeria.

Suggested Citation

  • Johnbaptist Ezenduka & Peter Nwaokennaya & Gbenga Benjamin Obasa & Geoffrey Ogbeke & Ogonna Onuorah & Lawal Abubakar & Adebobola Bashorun & Ginigeme Ogochukwu & Emerenini Franklin & Adewale Akinjeji, 2025. "Perception of People Living with HIV and Healthcare Workers on Differentiated Service Delivery Programs in Nigeria: A Qualitative Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309254
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309254
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309254&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0309254?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.