Author
Listed:
- Sunidhi Mehta
- Ida Holásková
- Matthew Walker
Abstract
Tactility plays a crucial role in our interactions with the physical world including our ability to differentiate textile textures and their associated comfort. There is an increasing focus on digitally interactive haptic experiences enabling consumers to feel virtual objects realistically. This could revolutionize how we experience textiles in e-commerce platform, virtual and augmented reality, and shape the future of textiles in the metaverse. In this study, we examined the impact of tactile sensitivity on touch perception of a large nonhomogeneous sample of 22 textile swatches. The tactile sensitivity was studied using four factors: assessors’ “subject-matter expertise”, “frequency of performing handiwork”, “frequency of working with textiles”, and “familiarity of textile textures”. The participants noted their tactile assessment of eight touch attributes of textile swatches on a 5-point Likert scale. Through predictive modeling, we analyzed the effect of tactile sensitivity on participants’ tactile assessment scores. Our key findings revealed that participants’ tactile sensitivity significantly influenced their perception of the textile textures. Notably, the “frequency of working with textiles” had the most substantial impact on participants’ tactile ratings followed by their familiarity with textile textures. Interestingly, the perceptual differences of isotropy attribute were significant in all the cases. Overall, there was no significant difference in the tactile ratings between textile experts and non-experts, except for nine occurrences, four of which were related to perceptual differences in roughness of the woven fabrics. Conversely, the two groups had no statistically significant differences at all in their perceptions of hairiness, scratchiness, and uniformity.
Suggested Citation
Sunidhi Mehta & Ida Holásková & Matthew Walker, 2024.
"Tactile sensitivity alters textile touch perception,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-22, September.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0308957
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308957
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0308957. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.