IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0308294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to the uptake of eye care services: A cross-sectional survey from rural and urban communities

Author

Listed:
  • Bismark Owusu-Afriyie
  • Nancy Peter
  • Felix Ivihi
  • Issac Kopil
  • Theresa Gende

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the barriers to the uptake of eye care services in urban and rural communities in Papua New Guinea. Methods: This was a population-based cross-sectional descriptive study and involved multi-stage sampling. Communities were randomly selected from each of the three clusters of Madang District for free eye care outreaches from June to September 2022. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data from the outreach patients. The study excluded attendees who refused to consent. Responses were rated from 1 (not a barrier) to 10 (a very strong barrier). The p-value significance was set at ≤ 0.05. Results: The majority of the 972 participants (60.2%) were from rural communities. The mean age of participants was 40.82 ± 13.14 years. Almost two-thirds of the participants (61.4%) never had an eye examination before this study was conducted. All the participants reported that time constraint, insufficient income, good vision in the fellow eye, not considering their eye conditions as serious issues and cultural beliefs were personal barriers to accessing eye care services. Provider-related challenges included long waiting periods at eye clinics and fear of procedure complications. There were differences in barriers with respect to the participants’ demographic clusters. Conclusion: There are major personal- and service-related barriers to eye care services in Madang. These barriers could be overcome through strategic human resource development, health education, school screening programs, and establishing eye care centres in the communities to improve the uptake of eye care services in Madang and more widely across the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Bismark Owusu-Afriyie & Nancy Peter & Felix Ivihi & Issac Kopil & Theresa Gende, 2024. "Barriers to the uptake of eye care services: A cross-sectional survey from rural and urban communities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0308294
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0308294
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0308294&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0308294?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muhammed Nazmul Islam & Thomas Engels & Shafayet Hossain & Malabika Sarker & Atonu Rabbani, 2019. "Willingness to Pay for Cataract Surgeries Among Patients Visiting Eye Care Facilities in Dhaka, Bangladesh," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 545-554, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0308294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.