IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0308272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sexual dysfunction among people with mental illness in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis study

Author

Listed:
  • Setegn Fentahun
  • Mamaru Melkam
  • Gebresilassie Tadesse
  • Gidey Rtbey
  • Fantahun Andualem
  • Yilkal Abebaw Wassie
  • Gebremariam Wulie Geremew
  • Tekletsadik Tekleslassie Alemayehu
  • Tewodros Denekew Haile
  • Tilahun Nega Godana
  • Berihun Agegn Mengistie
  • Mulualem Kelebie
  • Girum Nakie
  • Techilo Tinsae
  • Girmaw Medfu Takelle

Abstract

Background: Sexual dysfunction is the most frequent health problem among psychiatric patients. This could be the result of both the nature of the illness itself and the side effects of prescribed psychotropic medications. It also significantly affects an individual’s general well-being, interpersonal relationships, self-esteem, and treatment outcomes. Therefore, the current systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the combined prevalence of sexual dysfunction and its correlated factors among people with mental illness. Methods: We retrieved eligible primary studies using various search databases like PubMed, EMBASE, Science Direct, African Journal Online, Google Scholar, and Psychiatry Online. The report of this systematic review was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We used standardized data extraction checklists and STATA version 14 for data extraction and analysis, respectively. The I-squared statistics test was used to check statistical heterogeneity within the included articles. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and the Egger test. To estimate the overall prevalence and correlated factors of sexual dysfunction, a random effects model meta-analysis was employed. Results: In this meta-analysis, a total of 15 primary studies with 2849 psychiatric patients were included. The overall pooled prevalence of sexual dysfunction among psychiatric patients in Africa was 58.42% (95% CI: 49.55, 67.28). Having older age (OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.28, 2.87), longer duration of illness (OR = 2.60, 95% CI: 1.14, 5.93), history of relapse (OR = 3.51, 95% CI: 1.47, 8.43), poor quality of life (OR = 3.89, 95% CI: 2.15, 7.05), and antipsychotic medications (OR = 2.99, 95% CI: 1.84, 4.86) were significantly associated with sexual dysfunction. Conclusion: This meta-analysis revealed that approximately two-thirds of psychiatric patients in Africa are affected by sexual dysfunction. Therefore, the findings of this study recommend that when evaluating psychiatric patients, health professionals should focus more on sexual dysfunction. It is also essential to promote awareness and incorporate sexual health assessment and intervention into mental health services to reduce the overall burden of the problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Setegn Fentahun & Mamaru Melkam & Gebresilassie Tadesse & Gidey Rtbey & Fantahun Andualem & Yilkal Abebaw Wassie & Gebremariam Wulie Geremew & Tekletsadik Tekleslassie Alemayehu & Tewodros Denekew Hai, 2024. "Sexual dysfunction among people with mental illness in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0308272
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0308272
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0308272&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0308272?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0308272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.