IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0308078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk factors for nosocomial infection in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Xiangui Lv
  • Yan Han
  • Daiqiang Liu
  • Xinwei Chen
  • Lvlin Chen
  • Huang Huang
  • Chao Huang

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the risk factors of nosocomial infection during Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) treatment through systematic evaluation and meta-analysis, in order to provide evidence-based basis for clinical treatment and prevention of nosocomial infection during ECMO treatment. Method: Computer search of Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted to establish a database of relevant literature published in March 2023. Two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data, and evaluated quality based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and then analyzed the data using STATA 14.0 software. This plan is registered with PROSPERO as CRD42021271083. Result: A total of 2955 ECMO patients, including 933 nosocomial infected patients, were included in 23 articles. Meta analysis showed that immunosuppression, Heart transplantation, VA-ECMO, CRRT, red blood cell input, ECMO support time, mechanical ventilation time, ICU hospitalization time, and total hospitalization time were the risk factors for nosocomial infection in patients supported by ECMO. Conclusion: ECMO treatment for nosocomial infections in patients is related to multiple factors. In clinical work, medical staff should identify high-risk groups of ECMO nosocomial infections, actively take preventive measures, and reduce the incidence and mortality of nosocomial infections.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiangui Lv & Yan Han & Daiqiang Liu & Xinwei Chen & Lvlin Chen & Huang Huang & Chao Huang, 2024. "Risk factors for nosocomial infection in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-11, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0308078
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0308078
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0308078&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0308078?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0308078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.