Author
Listed:
- Noah Meier
- Mikhaila Gordon
- Simon van Noort
- Terry Reynolds
- Michal Rindos
- Filippo Di Giovanni
- Gavin R Broad
- Tamara Spasojevic
- Andrew Bennett
- Davide Dal Pos
- Seraina Klopfstein
Abstract
Species richness is one of the fundamental metrics of biodiversity. Estimating species richness helps spotlight taxonomic groups that are particularly under-studied, such as the highly diverse Darwin wasps. The only available estimate of the number of Darwin wasps in the Afrotropics proposed almost 11,000 species, compared to the 2,322 recorded species. However, it relied exclusively on the ratio of morphospecies to described species in Henry Townes’ personal collection. We provide an updated estimate of the Afrotropical Darwin wasp species, using empirical data from multiple sources, including the increase in species numbers following generic revisions, morphospecies sorting in natural history collections, and diversity patterns of better-studied insects (butterflies) for extrapolation. Our analyses suggest that our knowledge of Darwin wasps is highly incomplete, with only 13–22% of species known in the five most extensively studied countries in the Afrotropics. We estimate 9,206–15,577 species of Darwin wasps within the entire Afrotropics, with the highest concentration expected in the Equatorial Afrotropics and Madagascar. Due to data constraints, our approach tends to underestimate diversity at each step, rendering the upper estimate (15,577 species) more realistic. We highlight reasons contributing to the gap between recorded and estimated species richness, including logistical and financial factors, as well as post-colonial influences.
Suggested Citation
Noah Meier & Mikhaila Gordon & Simon van Noort & Terry Reynolds & Michal Rindos & Filippo Di Giovanni & Gavin R Broad & Tamara Spasojevic & Andrew Bennett & Davide Dal Pos & Seraina Klopfstein, 2024.
"Species richness estimation of the Afrotropical Darwin wasps (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae),"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-19, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0307404
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307404
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0307404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.