IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0307401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mixbiotic society measures: Assessment of community well-going as living system

Author

Listed:
  • Takeshi Kato
  • Jyunichi Miyakoshi
  • Tadayuki Matsumura
  • Ryuji Mine
  • Hiroyuki Mizuno
  • Yasuo Deguchi

Abstract

Social isolation and fragmentation represent global challenges, with the former stemming from a lack of interaction and the latter from exclusive mobs—both rooted in communication issues. Addressing these challenges, the philosophical realm introduces the concept of the “mixbiotic society.” In this framework, individuals with diverse freedoms and values mix together in physical proximity with diverse mingling, recognizing their respective “fundamental incapacities” and uniting in solidarity. This study aims to provide novel measures to balance freedom and solidarity, specifically the intermediate between isolation and mobbing, within a mixbiotic society. To achieve this, we introduce simplified measures to evaluate dynamic communication patterns. These measures complement traditional social network analysis of static structures and conventional entropy-based assessments of dynamic patterns. Our specific hypothesis posits that the measures corresponding to four distinct phases are established by representing communication patterns as multidimensional vectors. These measures include the mean of Euclidean distance to quantify “mobism” for fragmentation, the relative distance change for “atomism” indicating isolation, and a composite measure derived from multiplying the mean and variance of cosine similarity for “mixism,” reflecting the well-going state of a mixbiotic society. Additionally, nearly negligible measures correspond to “nihilism.” Through the evaluation of seven real-society datasets (high school, primary school, workplace, village, conference, online community, and email), we demonstrate the utility of the “mixism” measure in assessing freedom and solidarity in society. These measures can be employed to typify communities on a radar chart and a communication trajectory graph. The superiority of the measures lies in their ability to evaluate dynamic patterns, ease of calculation, and easily interpretable meanings compared to conventional analyses. As a future development, alongside additional validation using diverse datasets, the mixbiotic society measures will be employed to analyze social issues and applied in the fields of digital democracy and platform cooperativism.

Suggested Citation

  • Takeshi Kato & Jyunichi Miyakoshi & Tadayuki Matsumura & Ryuji Mine & Hiroyuki Mizuno & Yasuo Deguchi, 2024. "Mixbiotic society measures: Assessment of community well-going as living system," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0307401
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0307401
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0307401&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0307401?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0307401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.