IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0306669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individual participant data network meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for survivors of intimate partner violence: Study protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Christina Palantza
  • Karen Morgan
  • Nicky J Welton
  • Hannah M Micklitz
  • Lasse B Sander
  • Gene Feder

Abstract

Many systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been conducted in the field of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) and the evidence shows small to moderate effect sizes in improving mental health outcomes. However, there is considerable heterogeneity due to variation in participants, interventions and contexts. It is therefore important to establish which participant and intervention characteristics affect the different psychosocial outcomes in different contexts. Individual Participant Network Meta-analysis (IPDNMA) is a gold-standard method to estimate moderating effects, compare the effectiveness of different interventions and thus answer the question of which intervention is best-suited for whom. We will conduct an IPDNMA of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of psychosocial interventions for IPV survivors aimed at improving mental health, psychosocial outcomes such as self-efficacy and quality of life, reducing IPV and increasing safety-behaviours and dropout from the intervention (as an indication of intervention acceptability) compared to any type of control (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023488502). We aim to establish collaborations with the authors of eligible RCTs, to obtain and harmonise the Individual Participant Data of the trials. We will conduct one-stage IPDNMA under a Bayesian framework using the multinma package in R, after testing which characteristics of the participants and interventions are effect modifiers. We anticipate that not all study authors will provide access to IPD, which is a limitation of IPDNMA. We aim to address this by combining studies with aggregate data and studies with IPD using Multi-Level Network Meta-Regression (ML-NMR) implemented in the multinma R package. This approach is novel in the field and makes full use of available evidence to inform clinical and policy-related decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina Palantza & Karen Morgan & Nicky J Welton & Hannah M Micklitz & Lasse B Sander & Gene Feder, 2025. "Individual participant data network meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for survivors of intimate partner violence: Study protocol," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0306669
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0306669
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0306669&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0306669?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0051740 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0306669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.