IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0306253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative efficacy of 0.1% and 0.15% Sodium Hyaluronate on lipid layer and meibomian glands following cataract surgery: A randomized prospective study

Author

Listed:
  • Seung Ahn Yang
  • Mu Ryang Jeong
  • Cheon Ho Park
  • Ki Bum Cheon
  • Jun Ho Chang
  • Ji Eun Lee

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of a 0.15% HA with that of 0.1% HA eye drops for DES after cataract surgery. Methods: This study was double blinded, randomized and prospective study, and conducted in 69 participants (70 eyes) from Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital and executed from February 1, 2022 to November 30, 2022. Participants were adult cataract patients with normal lid position, not suffering from any other ocular disease and not meet the exclusion cirteria of clinical trial. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: 35 participants (17 males and 18 females) in the 0.1% HA group and 34 participants (19 males and 15 females) in the 0.15% HA group, receiving treatment six times daily for 6 weeks following cataract surgery. Subjective and objective assessments were performed at preoperative and postoperative visits, including ocular surface disease index score, tear break up time, corneal staining score, Schirmer’s I test score, lipid layer thickness), meiboscore, and biochemical analysis of the eye drops. Results: Throughout the study, the postoperative ocular surface disease index score was significantly lower in the group receiving 0.15% hyaluronic acid than in the group receiving 0.1% hyaluronic acid. Additionally, the postoperative ocular surface disease index score showed a significant positive correlation with the postoperative use of 0.15% hyaluronic acid and the preoperative Schirmer’s I test score. In multivariate analysis, treatment with 0.15% hyaluronic acid and the preoperative ocular surface disease index score were significant independent parameters affecting the postoperative ocular surface disease index score. Conclusion: The use of 0.15% hyaluronic acid is recommended for its potential advantages in alleviating symptoms following cataract surgery, making it a viable alternative to traditional 0.1% hyaluronic acid treatment. Trial registration: ISRCTN95830348.

Suggested Citation

  • Seung Ahn Yang & Mu Ryang Jeong & Cheon Ho Park & Ki Bum Cheon & Jun Ho Chang & Ji Eun Lee, 2024. "Comparative efficacy of 0.1% and 0.15% Sodium Hyaluronate on lipid layer and meibomian glands following cataract surgery: A randomized prospective study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0306253
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0306253
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0306253&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0306253?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0306253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.