IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0306130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Randomized experimental population-based study to evaluate the acceptance and completion of and preferences for cervical cancer screening

Author

Listed:
  • Marcela Vieira Lordelo
  • Cleyton Zanardo Oliveira
  • Luisa Aguirre Buexm
  • Rui Manuel Vieira Reis
  • Adhemar Longatto-Filho
  • Júlio César Possati-Resende
  • Fabiana de Lima Vazquez
  • José Humberto Tavares Guerreiro Fregnani

Abstract

Cervical cancer has high incidence and mortality rates, especially in less-developed countries. Prevention methods are well established, but there are still barriers preventing some Brazilian women from undergoing a Pap sample. The objective of the study was to evaluate the acceptance, preferences and completion of four screening methods. This has an experimental design (community trial). A total of 164 participants who had never had a Pap sample or had not had one for more than three years were included. The city’s urban area was stratified by census tracts and divided according to income and education levels. Women belonging to the lower-income strata were considered in the study. Random blocks were numbered into five intervention groups (Group 1- Pap sample at the hospital; Group 2- Pap sample in the mobile unit; Group 3- urine self-collection; Group 4- vaginal self-collection; Group 5- woman’s choice). Only 164 women met all of the eligibility criteria (15.3%). Most of them accepted the assigned method (92%), but only 84% of the women completed the collection step. The acceptance rates were as follows: Group 1 (100%), Group 2 (64.5%), Group 3 (100%) and Group 4 (91.4%). In Group 5, the women’s preferences were distributed as follows: examination performed at the hospital, 13 women (33.3%); examination performed at the mobile unit, 11 women (28.2%); urine self-collection, 11 women (28.2%); and vaginal self-collection, 4 women (10.3%). This study suggests that methods that allow cervical sampling collected near the women’s domicile might improve the acceptance and completion of preventive tests. This finding is relevant for the development of new cervical cancer screening strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcela Vieira Lordelo & Cleyton Zanardo Oliveira & Luisa Aguirre Buexm & Rui Manuel Vieira Reis & Adhemar Longatto-Filho & Júlio César Possati-Resende & Fabiana de Lima Vazquez & José Humberto Tavare, 2024. "Randomized experimental population-based study to evaluate the acceptance and completion of and preferences for cervical cancer screening," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0306130
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0306130
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0306130&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0306130?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0306130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.