IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0306076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drug-resistant tuberculosis care and treatment outcomes over the last 15 years in Ethiopia: Results from a mixed-method review of trends

Author

Listed:
  • E Tesema
  • M Biru
  • T Leta
  • A Kumsa
  • A Liaulseged
  • G Gizatie
  • T Bogale
  • M Million
  • D G Datiko
  • A Gebreyohannes
  • Y Molla
  • N Hiruy
  • M Mebnga
  • P G Suarez
  • Z G Dememew
  • D Jerene

Abstract

Background and objectives: Drug resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) remains a global challenge with about a third of the cases are not detected. With the recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment follow-up of DR-TB, there have been improvements with treatment success rates. However, there is limited evidence on the successful models of care that have consistently registered good outcomes. Our aim was to assess Ethiopia’s experience in scaling up an ambulatory, decentralized model of care while managing multiple regimen transition processes and external shocks. Methods: This was a cross-sectional, mixed-method study. For the quantitative data, we reviewed routine surveillance data for the period 2009–2022 and collected additional data from publicly available reports. We then analyzed the data descriptively. Qualitative data were collected from program reports, quarterly presentations, minutes of technical working group meetings, and clinical review committee reports and analyzed thematically. Results: The number of DR-TB treatment initiating centers increased from 1 to 67, and enrollment increased from 88 in 2010 to 741 in 2019, but declined to 518 in 2022. A treatment success rate (TSR) of over 70% was sustained. The decentralized and ambulatory service delivery remained the core service delivery model. The country successfully navigated multiple regimen transitions, including the recently introduced six-month short oral regimen. Several challenges remain, including the lack of strong and sustainable specimen transportation system, lack of established systems for timely tracing and linking of missed DR-TB cases, and data quality issues. Conclusions: Ethiopia scaled up a decentralized ambulatory model of care, kept up to date with recent developments in treatment regimens, and maintained a high TSR, despite the influence of multiple external challenges. The recent decline in case notification requires a deeper look into the underlying reasons. The feasibility of fully integrating DR-TB treatment and follow up at community level should be explored further.

Suggested Citation

  • E Tesema & M Biru & T Leta & A Kumsa & A Liaulseged & G Gizatie & T Bogale & M Million & D G Datiko & A Gebreyohannes & Y Molla & N Hiruy & M Mebnga & P G Suarez & Z G Dememew & D Jerene, 2024. "Drug-resistant tuberculosis care and treatment outcomes over the last 15 years in Ethiopia: Results from a mixed-method review of trends," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0306076
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0306076
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0306076&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0306076?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0306076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.