IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0305473.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“The straw that broke the camel’s back”: An analysis of racialized women clinicians’ experiences providing diabetes care

Author

Listed:
  • Arani Sivakumar
  • Simrit Rana
  • David Rofaiel
  • Tehmina Ahmad
  • Shriya Hari
  • Catherine H Yu

Abstract

Introduction: Racialized women clinicians (RWCs) experience the brunt of unfair racial and gendered expectations, which is a direct result of their visible identity. Our study sought to understand how these experiences intersect to impact the personal and professional well-being of RWCs, and their approach to diabetes care. Methods: Data were collected from 24 RWCs working within Canadian diabetes care settings, who participated in semi-structured, one-on-one interviews conducted from April 2021 to September 2021. The data were qualitatively analyzed using thematic analysis to develop emergent themes, and interactions were explored using the socioecological model (SEM), adapted to our study context. Results: We identified three themes: (1) Discordance between self-identity and relational identity impacted how RWCs interacted with others, and how others interacted with them; (2) Tokenistic, “inclusive” organizational policies/practices and inherently racist and sexist social norms permitted acts of discrimination and led to the systematic othering and exclusion of RWCs within the workplace; and (3) Differential treatment of RWCs had both positive and negative impacts on participants’ relational, workplace and self-identity. Using the SEM, we also found that differential treatment of RWCs stems from upstream policies, structures, and social norms, percolating through different levels of the SEM, including work environments and communities, which eventually impacts one’s relational identity, as well as one’s perception of oneself. Conclusion: The differential treatment of RWCs arises predominantly from macro systems of the work environment. The burden to address these disparities must be shifted to the source (i.e., namely systems) by implementing interventions that equitably value diversity efforts, institute policies of accountability and correction of implicit biases, and prioritize an inclusive culture broadly across faculty and leadership.

Suggested Citation

  • Arani Sivakumar & Simrit Rana & David Rofaiel & Tehmina Ahmad & Shriya Hari & Catherine H Yu, 2024. "“The straw that broke the camel’s back”: An analysis of racialized women clinicians’ experiences providing diabetes care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-24, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0305473
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0305473
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0305473&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0305473?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rachel Hennein & Hannah Gorman & Victoria Chung & Sarah R Lowe, 2023. "Gender discrimination among women healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from a mixed methods study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0305473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.