IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0305442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the feasibility of large language models to identify top research priorities in enhanced external counterpulsation

Author

Listed:
  • Shengkun Gai
  • Fangwan Huang
  • Xuanyun Liu
  • Ryan G Benton
  • Glen M Borchert
  • Jingshan Huang
  • Xiuyu Leng

Abstract

Enhanced External Counterpulsation (EECP), as a non-invasive, cost-effective, and efficient adjunctive circulatory technique, has been widely applied in in the cardiovascular field. Numerous studies and clinical observations have confirmed the obvious advantages of EECP in promoting blood flow perfusion to vital organs such as the heart, brain, and kidneys. However, many potential mechanisms of EECP remain insufficiently validated, necessitating researchers to dedicate substantial time and effort to in-depth investigations. In this work, large language models (such as ChatGPT and Ernie Bot) were used to identify top research priorities in five key topics in the field of EECP: mechanisms, device improvements, cardiovascular applications, neurological applications, and other applications. After generating specific research priorities in each domain through language models, a panel of nine experienced EECP experts was invited to independently evaluate and score them based on four parameters: relevance, originality, clarity, and specificity. Notably, high average and median scores for these evaluation parameters were obtained, indicating a strong endorsement from experts in the EECP field. This study preliminarily suggests that large language models like ChatGPT and Ernie Bot could serve as powerful tools for identifying and prioritizing research priorities in the EECP domain.

Suggested Citation

  • Shengkun Gai & Fangwan Huang & Xuanyun Liu & Ryan G Benton & Glen M Borchert & Jingshan Huang & Xiuyu Leng, 2025. "Assessing the feasibility of large language models to identify top research priorities in enhanced external counterpulsation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0305442
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0305442
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0305442&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0305442?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0305442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.