IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0305187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Episodic disability framework in the context of Long COVID: Findings from a community-engaged international qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Kelly K O’Brien
  • Darren A Brown
  • Kiera McDuff
  • Natalie St. Clair-Sullivan
  • Soo Chan Carusone
  • Catherine Thomson
  • Lisa McCorkell
  • Hannah Wei
  • Susie Goulding
  • Margaret O’Hara
  • Niamh Roche
  • Ruth Stokes
  • Mary Kelly
  • Angela M Cheung
  • Kristine M Erlandson
  • Richard Harding
  • Jaime H Vera
  • Colm Bergin
  • Larry Robinson
  • Lisa Avery
  • Ciaran Bannan
  • Brittany Torres
  • Imelda O’Donovan
  • Nisa Malli
  • Patricia Solomon

Abstract

Background: Increasing numbers of adults are living with the health-related consequences of Long COVID. The Episodic Disability Framework (EDF), derived from perspectives of adults living with HIV, characterizes the multi-dimensional and episodic nature of health-related challenges (disability) experienced by an individual. Our aim was to determine the applicability of the Episodic Disability Framework to conceptualize the health-related challenges experienced among adults living with Long COVID. Methods: We conducted a community-engaged qualitative descriptive study involving online semi-structured interviews. We recruited adults who self-identified as living with Long COVID via collaborator community organizations in Canada, Ireland, United Kingdom, and United States. We purposively recruited for diversity in age, gender identity, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and time since initial COVID-19 infection. We used a semi-structured interview guide informed by the EDF to explore experiences of disability living with Long COVID, specifically health-related challenges and how challenges were experienced over time. We conducted a group-based content analysis. Results: Of the 40 participants, the median age was 39 years; and the majority were white (73%), women (63%), living with Long COVID for ≥ 1 year (83%). Consistent with the Episodic Disability Framework, disability was described as multi-dimensional and episodic, characterized by unpredictable periods of health and illness. Experiences of disability were consistent with the three main components of the Framework: A) dimensions of disability (physical, cognitive, mental-emotional health challenges, difficulties with day-to-day activities, challenges to social inclusion, uncertainty); B) contextual factors, extrinsic (social support; accessibility of environment and health services; stigma and epistemic injustice) and intrinsic (living strategies; personal attributes) that exacerbate or alleviate dimensions of disability; and C) triggers that initiate episodes of disability. Conclusions: The Episodic Disability Framework provides a way to conceptualize the multi-dimensional and episodic nature of disability experienced by adults living with Long COVID. The Framework provides guidance for future measurement of disability, and health and rehabilitation approaches to enhance practice, research, and policy in Long COVID.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelly K O’Brien & Darren A Brown & Kiera McDuff & Natalie St. Clair-Sullivan & Soo Chan Carusone & Catherine Thomson & Lisa McCorkell & Hannah Wei & Susie Goulding & Margaret O’Hara & Niamh Roche & Ru, 2025. "Episodic disability framework in the context of Long COVID: Findings from a community-engaged international qualitative study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-38, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0305187
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0305187
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0305187&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0305187?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0305187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.